2015
DOI: 10.15408/sdi.v1i1.1387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Citizenship Challenges in Myanmar’s Democratic Transition: Case Study of the Rohingya-Muslim

Abstract: It specializes in Indonesian Islamic studies in particular, and Southeast Asian Islamic studies in general, and is intended to communicate original researches and current issues on the subject. is journal warmly welcomes contributions from scholars of related disciplines. All submitted papers are subject to double-blind review process. STUDIA ISLAMIKA has been accredited by e Ministry of Education and Culture, Republic of Indonesia as an academic journal (SK Dirjen Dikti No. 56/DIKTI/Kep/2012). STUDIA ISLAMI… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Al Imran & Mian (2014) argue that Bangladesh should enter into bilateral or multilateral treaties to garner the support needed to resolve the crisis, as well as engage the international community in general to pressure Myanmar to take the lead in resolving the problem, while Brinham (2017) talks of a "joined-up effort to secure durable solutions". Suaedy & Hafiz (2015) take a different approach in examining the decades-long struggle of the Rohingya to gain citizenship in Myanmar, noting that "stronger international and ASEAN involvement is needed to change the Myanmar government policy of discrimination against minorities, particularly the Rohingya" (p. 57). The fundamental flaw in this collective pressure approach, however, is the fact that the international community, led predominantly by the United States (US) and the EU-itself a collection of sovereign countries-have been attempting to pressure the Myanmar government to address their deplorable human rights policies for decades.…”
Section: Solutions Specific To the Rohingya Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al Imran & Mian (2014) argue that Bangladesh should enter into bilateral or multilateral treaties to garner the support needed to resolve the crisis, as well as engage the international community in general to pressure Myanmar to take the lead in resolving the problem, while Brinham (2017) talks of a "joined-up effort to secure durable solutions". Suaedy & Hafiz (2015) take a different approach in examining the decades-long struggle of the Rohingya to gain citizenship in Myanmar, noting that "stronger international and ASEAN involvement is needed to change the Myanmar government policy of discrimination against minorities, particularly the Rohingya" (p. 57). The fundamental flaw in this collective pressure approach, however, is the fact that the international community, led predominantly by the United States (US) and the EU-itself a collection of sovereign countries-have been attempting to pressure the Myanmar government to address their deplorable human rights policies for decades.…”
Section: Solutions Specific To the Rohingya Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with this view, many suggest that the early Muslim settlers had largely assimilated to local Rakhine society and did not articulate a separate ethnic or communal status. In the 1872 population census the British therefore simply recorded them as the Arakan Muslims (Suaedy and Hafiz, ). In other documents they further distinguished between Burmese Muslims, who had inhabited the land prior to the arrival of the British and Indian Muslims (Pugh, ).…”
Section: Background Of the Rohingyamentioning
confidence: 99%