2005
DOI: 10.1017/s1537592705050206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Citizenship, Same-Sex Marriage, and Feminist Critiques of Marriage

Abstract: The debate over same-sex marriage in the United States is fundamentally a disagreement about the nature of democratic citizenship and the meaning of full inclusion of adult citizens in the polity. The facts that marriage has both private and public dimensions, and is described by policy makers as natural and unchanging even as they write laws to define it create confusion among those who publicly contest same-sex marriage. The feminist critique of marriage provides insight on the issue; its critique, al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as was pointed out in our textual analysis, there is another faction within the LGBTQ movement that has shifted from a "critical approach" toward a claim of universal citizenship (in the sense of a guarantee of access to rights by virtue of citizenship). This part of the movement reaffirms a refusal to be incorporated into and to conform to the existing patriarchal, heteronormative social order (Josephson, 2005).…”
Section: Discussion: a Shared Discursive Framementioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, as was pointed out in our textual analysis, there is another faction within the LGBTQ movement that has shifted from a "critical approach" toward a claim of universal citizenship (in the sense of a guarantee of access to rights by virtue of citizenship). This part of the movement reaffirms a refusal to be incorporated into and to conform to the existing patriarchal, heteronormative social order (Josephson, 2005).…”
Section: Discussion: a Shared Discursive Framementioning
confidence: 86%
“…The relative newness of this institution is not discussed at all, nor are the political hoops through which lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) activist groups had to jump in order to attain such legislative change. The absence of any reference to the politics of marriage in South Africa, together with the repeated use of the word 'lifetime' (which implies that each lifetime will witness a wedding), contribute to make the institution of samesex marriage appear natural and thus apolitical (see also Josephson 2005).…”
Section: Home Pagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst the relationship between women and their children is constructed as natural and purely biological, marriage is a way in which fathers are made into political beings. In many cases, kinship laws prioritise marriage contracts over biological paternity, and men's relations to their children are only apolitical and understood biologically when no marriage contract exists to determine paternity (Josephson 2005). Thus, marriage plays a role in eliminating the potential sexual threats of other men, along with the provision of heirs (Mann 1994).…”
Section: Index Page Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated, there are several economic and social rights and privileges that are allocated through marriage, including access to partner employment and health benefits, welfare bonuses, medical information and decision rights, adoption and second parent rights, parental leave benefits, and immigration and travel privileges (Josephson, 2005).…”
Section: Case Study Three Gay and Lesbian Organizations Of Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gay conservatives such as Andrew Sullivan and Bruce Bawer claim that the erasure of sexuality is a necessary and positive outcome of the legalization of same-sex marriage. The institution of marriage, they argue, will serve to civilize and regulate homosexuals according to the heterosexual values of monogamy, life-long commitment, private dependence and economic self-sufficiency (Bell & Binnie, 2000;Josephson, 2005). Thus, through the structure of marriage, homosexuals can and will assume the same civil responsibilities of their heterosexual counterparts and sexuality will become a matter of private concern.…”
Section: Normalizing Homosexualitymentioning
confidence: 99%