2017
DOI: 10.4103/2348-3334.196037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Citrobacter as a uropathogen, its prevalence and antibiotics susceptibility pattern

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
18
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sami et al found that Citrobacter species isolated from UTI patients were sensitive to Imipenem (100), Amikacin (85.2%), and Gentamicin (77.4%), which is consistent with our findings. In addition, they found sensitivity to Nitrofurantoin (66.1%), Ciprofloxacin (56.2%), Ceftriaxone (50.9%), and cefotaxime (43.3%) which are lower than ours 52 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…Sami et al found that Citrobacter species isolated from UTI patients were sensitive to Imipenem (100), Amikacin (85.2%), and Gentamicin (77.4%), which is consistent with our findings. In addition, they found sensitivity to Nitrofurantoin (66.1%), Ciprofloxacin (56.2%), Ceftriaxone (50.9%), and cefotaxime (43.3%) which are lower than ours 52 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…The work of [29] also found that C. koseri were the predominant urine pathogen and recorded high rates of resistance to cefexime, amox-cla and cephaloxin. In addition, according to [30], some Citrobacter isolates contain chromosomally mediated β-lactamases such as Cephalosporinase and Penicillinase that have led to the emergence of drug resistance and treatment failure despite initial susceptibility [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a retrospective analysis carried out from January 2009 to December 2010 using urine samples from 4126 patients in India, Citrobacter was found to be the third most common causative agent of UTIs in hospitalized patients, next only to Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp., accounting for up to 9.4% of all isolates (Peerapur et al, 2013). Similarly, in another study (Sami et al, 2017) conducted in Northern India, among 246 patients who tested positive for Citrobacter spp., C. amalonaticus was reported in 9.75% of the patients. A study (Garcia et al, 2016) reporting four cases of C. amalonaticus infection in patients hospitalized in Marseille, France, using MALDI-TOF technique observed statistically higher prevalence of the UTI episodes, thereby indicating that this bacterium could be an emerging pathogen responsible for UTIs in immunocompromised patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%