1958
DOI: 10.1086/449769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

City Hierarchies and the Distribution of City Size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
123
0
3

Year Published

1976
1976
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 288 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
123
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the hierarchical ranking of cities is usually assessed looking at their population, mainly focusing on the size-distribution of cities (Beckmann, 1958). On the other hand, from a functional perspective, the focus is put mainly on the distribution of functions and, as a consequence, on the centralities emerging within the region from the interaction among urban centres.…”
Section: Morphological Vs Functional Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the hierarchical ranking of cities is usually assessed looking at their population, mainly focusing on the size-distribution of cities (Beckmann, 1958). On the other hand, from a functional perspective, the focus is put mainly on the distribution of functions and, as a consequence, on the centralities emerging within the region from the interaction among urban centres.…”
Section: Morphological Vs Functional Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some contributions to both areas are discussed below. Beckmann (1958) and Parr (1969) are interested in the sizes of the cities on different levels of hierarchy in Christaller's central place system. Based on the assumptions that the size of a city is proportional to the population it serves and that each city of a certain order has a certain number of "satellite" cities of the next lower order, Beckmann develops a system of multipliers by which the respective city sizes can be found.…”
Section: The Impact Of Christaller's and Lösch's Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been amply investigated at the regional level, using cities and towns as solid points and seeking their scale distribution within an interurban hierarchy [2][3][4][5][6][7]. Yet, a city should be viewed not only as a physical entity, but also as a pattern of point locations connected by flows of people, information, money, and commodities, as stated in the theory of The Urban Field [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%