2020
DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2020.1816024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Civic ethics as a normative framework for responsible research and innovation

Abstract: Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) is a term used in Europe to advance in the consideration of societal and ethical dimensions of research and innovation. RRI involves two main challenges: its rationale its practical development. The legitimacy of RRI is based on its ethical foundation. Different ethical traditions, such as procedural ethics, have been identified as underpinning the RRI conceptualizations so far. The objective of this article is to examine the evolution of discursive ethics proposed by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Philosophical inquiries in this issue include those into values as practices versus as entities in responsible innovation (Boenink and Kudina 2020), the relation between virtue and governance as inspired by the work of Hannah Arendt (Reijers 2020), civic ethics as a source of normative legitimation for efforts aimed at responsible innovation (Lozano and Monsonís-Payá 2020) and the distribution of ethical labor across scientific communities in a dozen nations (Politi and Grinbaum 2020).…”
Section: Closing Out Twenty-twenty On a Positive Notementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Philosophical inquiries in this issue include those into values as practices versus as entities in responsible innovation (Boenink and Kudina 2020), the relation between virtue and governance as inspired by the work of Hannah Arendt (Reijers 2020), civic ethics as a source of normative legitimation for efforts aimed at responsible innovation (Lozano and Monsonís-Payá 2020) and the distribution of ethical labor across scientific communities in a dozen nations (Politi and Grinbaum 2020).…”
Section: Closing Out Twenty-twenty On a Positive Notementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, we wanted to discuss how the process developed contributed to the application of the principles the authors proposed (Lozano & Monsonís-Payá, 2020) for a practical dialogue about RRI: inclusion, symmetry, no coercion, and publicity and accountability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach followed in the INPERRI project is inspired by a dialogical conception of responsibility, justifying the participation of interested groups in the process of discussion and decision-making. Also, the authors of this study justified the implications of considering dialogical ethics, and specifically, civic ethics of Adela Cortina as a normative framework for RRI (Lozano & Monsonís-Payá, 2020). In this work and inspired by Habermas (1983), some principles were proposed for practical dialogues about RRI in real settings: inclusion, symmetry, no coercion and publicity and accountability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This addresses tensions between dialogue and discourse by Habermas and Foucault (see section 3.3.2) As any other practice, participation and societal engagement are shaped by and perpetuate imaginaries of their ideal practice. In invited engagement as favored under R(R)I, Habermas' ideal of 'rational communication' prevails as R(R)I emphasizes a legitimate procedure over a particular normative stance and promotes a specific way of collaboration between actors (Lozano andMonsonís-Payá 2020, Bauer, Bogner, and. Early upstream engagement tends to build on this understanding of dialogue as my case studies showed: dialogue relies on ideals of actors' willingness to listen to each other, to adjust one's perspective, and to find common ground in contestations.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%