2010
DOI: 10.4324/9780203850589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Civil Society and Democratization in the Arab World

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theoretically, this means that the democratic role of civil society should not be assumed as a normative quality, but confirmed in each context (Encarnación, 2003). Acting like 'a mirror', civil society reflects the broader political context (Cavatorta & Durac, 2011). According to Edwards (2004), 'the big idea of civil society' is eventually a synthesis of its heterogeneous elements captured by both scholarships.…”
Section: Civil Society: What Is In a Name?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, this means that the democratic role of civil society should not be assumed as a normative quality, but confirmed in each context (Encarnación, 2003). Acting like 'a mirror', civil society reflects the broader political context (Cavatorta & Durac, 2011). According to Edwards (2004), 'the big idea of civil society' is eventually a synthesis of its heterogeneous elements captured by both scholarships.…”
Section: Civil Society: What Is In a Name?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the EU had previously acknowledged civil initiative as an important element of the implementation of European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) and in the creation of a EU-friendly Mediterranean Neighbourhood, this new salience of civil society in political discourse nevertheless seems to have come as a surprise. As Cavatorta and Durac (2011) forcefully argued, this surprise stems in large part from a fundamental misreading of civil society and its socio-political role in Arab societies and, as a result, a search for Eurocentric coherence, conformity and recognizability in dealing with local civil society groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, for example, in their study of the Dominican Republic, Espinal et al (2006) demonstrate that increased civic engagement decreases political trust since it exposes citizens to the illegitimate and corrupt practices of government institutions. Other findings generated in authoritarian or semi-authoritarian settings and poorly consolidated democracies, such as the ones in the Arab world (Rahman 2002;Liverani 2008;Cavatorta and Durac 2010), seem to suggest that social capital is reasonably high and that 'trust' in institutions is also high, although it takes on a rather different meaning from the one generally employed. These findings also resonate with studies on South Asia, where examinations of whether civil society associations contribute to democratic citizenship show that association membership is only weakly related to generalised trust and toleration of social diversity, suggesting that the relationship between civic society activism and political trust across East Asia is more complicated than mainstream assumptions would hold (Park 2012).…”
Section: Consequences Of Political Trust In Authoritarian Settings: Smentioning
confidence: 98%