2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11266-018-9949-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Civil Society, Legitimacy and Political Space: Why Some Organisations are More Vulnerable to Restrictions than Others in Violent and Divided Contexts

Abstract: This paper examines legitimacy and political space for civil society in violent and divided contexts. It draws on qualitative fieldwork with civil society groups in Burundi, where government restrictions and political violence have increased in recent years. However, not all civil society groups experienced these pressures in the same way, and some were more vulnerable to restrictions than others. This paper asks why and considers whether civil society legitimacy can help to explain some of these differences. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Drawing on ethnographic research conducted in Peru in 2017 and 2018, I argue that the criminalization of social protest is a form of governing dissent groups that oppose large-scale extractive projects. These restrictions on the scope of action of civil society organizations have been observed in various regions of the world in recent years and have been referred to in terms of the concept of a shrinking space for civil society (Della Porta and Steinhilper 2021; Popplewell 2018; Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights Defenders 2016). In the context of resource extractivism, in particular, governments tend to constrain grassroots movements and activists by limiting civic participation and restricting political rights (Terwindt and Schliemann 2017a, 2017b).…”
Section: Notes From the Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing on ethnographic research conducted in Peru in 2017 and 2018, I argue that the criminalization of social protest is a form of governing dissent groups that oppose large-scale extractive projects. These restrictions on the scope of action of civil society organizations have been observed in various regions of the world in recent years and have been referred to in terms of the concept of a shrinking space for civil society (Della Porta and Steinhilper 2021; Popplewell 2018; Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights Defenders 2016). In the context of resource extractivism, in particular, governments tend to constrain grassroots movements and activists by limiting civic participation and restricting political rights (Terwindt and Schliemann 2017a, 2017b).…”
Section: Notes From the Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, these groups are sometimes accused of being "grass without roots," 23 and their legitimacy questioned. 24 A common critique for especially civil society organizations dependent on foreign funds is that these actors are more responsive to donors' concerns as opposed to the needs of the local communities they are supposed to serve, which means these organizations are viewed as advocating for issues that are important to Western audiences, not to local people. Indeed, Dupuy and Prakash, "Why Restrictive NGO Foreign" argue that it is unsurprising that when governments decide to crackdown on NGOs and justify it by branding NGOs as foreign agents, there is little popular opposition by citizens in response.…”
Section: Government Repression and Public Opinion In Africa Regarding...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The legitimacy of NGOs/CSOs in Burundi has also been attributed to benefit local authorities from their capacity to attract foreign financing. In such circumstances, NGOs are able to forge closer ties with political actors (Bawole & Hossain, 2015;Popplewell, 2018). However, the evaluation indicates that community responses have generated their own revenue, which contributes to the project's intended outcomes.…”
Section: Inmentioning
confidence: 99%