1998
DOI: 10.1123/ssj.15.2.138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Civil Society, Physical Activity, and the Involvement of Sport Sociologists in the Preparation of Physical Activity Professionals

Abstract: Civil society refers broadly to processes of collective decision-making and action that entail (a) active, uncoerced involvement; (b) trust of one’s fellow citizens; (c) responsibility and care for the well-being of others; and (d) social networks featuring many horizontal relationships. There is much evidence that a robust civil society is related to a better quality of life. Unfortunately, there is also evidence that civil society is declining, squeezed by both the market and the state. Because sports and ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, such a position within society has actually been found to be strong in comparison with other social institutions within the community (Seippel, 2008), and that the true impact of sport upon social capital is widely undecided (e.g., Coalter, 2007). In fact, Putnam's notion of sport being able to generate networks linking individuals and groups within a community has resonated in past literature where sport provides opportunities for civic engagement (Harris, 1998) and can positively impact community development (Misener & Mason, 2006). Past research has similarly iterated where sport has enhanced social capital construction in rural communities (Atherley, 2006), among specific members of communities (Amara et al, 2004) and through community ownership and engagement (Jarvie, 2003).…”
Section: Social Capitalmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, such a position within society has actually been found to be strong in comparison with other social institutions within the community (Seippel, 2008), and that the true impact of sport upon social capital is widely undecided (e.g., Coalter, 2007). In fact, Putnam's notion of sport being able to generate networks linking individuals and groups within a community has resonated in past literature where sport provides opportunities for civic engagement (Harris, 1998) and can positively impact community development (Misener & Mason, 2006). Past research has similarly iterated where sport has enhanced social capital construction in rural communities (Atherley, 2006), among specific members of communities (Amara et al, 2004) and through community ownership and engagement (Jarvie, 2003).…”
Section: Social Capitalmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Past research efforts indicate that sport has proven to reach out across diverse demographics such as age, class, and race (Harris, 1998;Palmer & Thompson, 2007). In fact, it was Harris (1998) who described sports as "communal endeavors" (p. 146) where social networks are created and subsequently transcend nearly all classes of people.…”
Section: Social Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Harris (1998) suggests that sport can be used to foster new friendships and social connectivity, often across class, religious and ethnic boundaries. This can include players, non-playing participants (e.g.…”
Section: Social Capital and Sportmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…According to the Sport and Recreation New Zelland (SPARC) (2003), sport and physical activity fosters cooperation and helps strengthen social ties and networks within communities. For example, Harris (1998), suggest that sport can be used to foster new friendship and social connectivity often across class, religous and ethnic boundaries. There is a significant parallel between extending sports, which is one of the most common and influential institutions of modern society, to wider populations and having people play sports as well as the development level of the society (Ünal, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%