Civilian-military pooling of health care resources in Haiti: a theory of complementarities perspective

Naor, Michael; Dey, Asoke; Goldstein, Susan B.; Rosen, Yitzhak

doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1355121

Cited by 20 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 59 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In this article Naor et al (2017) argue that post Haiti earthquake in 2010, the global need for rapid deployment of disasterrelated relief activities is on the rise. They posit interesting research propositions based on theory of complementary, on coordination among civil-military actors, and use multiple-case studies approach to investigate the opportunities and barriers for relief organisations to pool complementary resources from various countries.…”

Section: Civil-military Pooling Of Health Care Resources In Haiti: a mentioning

confidence: 99%

Bridging humanitarian operations management and organisational theory

Gunasekaran

Dubey

Wamba

et al. 2018

International Journal of Production Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Civil-military Pooling Of Health Care Resources In Haiti: a mentioning

confidence: 99%

Bridging humanitarian operations management and organisational theory

Gunasekaran

Dubey

Wamba

et al. 2018

International Journal of Production Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is known from the commercial domain that close partnerships are not the answer to everything (De Leeuw and Fransoo 2009) and this most likely will hold in humanitarian logistics. Case studies similar to the work of Naor et al (2017) will help shedding light on this matter. Such studies may also help in providing directions for building networks of collaborative efforts that go beyond the dyad.…”

Section: Implication For Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Cross-sector partnership research in this domain is still in its infancy (Nurmala, de Leeuw, and Dullaert 2017). Exceptions are the recent works of Naor et al (2017), who investigated civilian-military resource pooling in health care using case studies, and Rueede and Kreutzer (2014) on a partnership between DPDHL and UN OCHA to solve bottleneck issues at airports. Even though the urgency and relevance of initiating cross-sector partnerships with the business sector has been argued and frameworks have been proposed (see for example Oglesby and Burke 2012;Oloruntoba and Gray 2009;Van Wassenhove 2006), empirical research on these cross-sector partnerships in managing humanitarian logistics is scant.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cross-sector humanitarian–business partnerships in managing humanitarian logistics: an empirical verification

Nurmala

Vries

Leeuw

2018

International Journal of Production Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cross-Sector humanitarian-business partnerships in managing humanitarian logistics comprise a key discussion topic in literature, yet empirical validations of these partnerships are lacking to date. This paper aims to develop a typological framework for humanitarian-business partnerships in managing humanitarian logistics and to empirically verify this typology with a data-set using content analysis. The results show that the amounts of partnerships developed between the business sector and the humanitarian sector in managing humanitarian logistics is still limited and these partnerships are not widely publicised. The research furthermore shows that financial contributions comprise the most common type of resource delivered by the business sector when it comes to partnerships with the humanitarian sector focused on managing humanitarian logistics. It is also interesting to note that the majority of partnerships in our sample are dyadic in nature, managed by a single humanitarian organisation and a single business corporation. Furthermore, we find that most of the partnerships target support for natural disaster emergency relief operations and mainly focus on disaster response.

show abstract

“…Only after interventions by the European Commission did Germany lift the ban and agree to releasing exports to neighboring countries (Reuters 2020 ). In this context, European disaster management and involved governments have/had problems to operationalize common strategies proposed by the humanitarian logistics literature to pool resources and to share them jointly (Balcik et al 2010 ; Naor et al 2018 ).…”

Section: Lessons (Not) Learned By European Disaster Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

European disaster management in response to the COVID-19 pandemic

Wankmüller

2020

Mind Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Top priority of governments in containing the COVID-19 pandemic is “flattening the curve” which implies a slowing down of the virus’ spread across the entire population. The situation which European policymakers are facing at the moment is completely new and only few of them have the required experience to handle a disaster of such magnitude. What is important now is to avoid problems that repeatedly occurred in past disaster responses by learning the lessons and acting accordingly. This paper reflects on European disaster management in containing the spread of COVID-19 and uncovers response inefficiencies that are still present.

show abstract

Civilian-military pooling of health care resources in Haiti: a theory of complementarities perspective

Cited by 20 publications

References 59 publications

Bridging humanitarian operations management and organisational theory

Bridging humanitarian operations management and organisational theory

Cross-sector humanitarian–business partnerships in managing humanitarian logistics: an empirical verification

European disaster management in response to the COVID-19 pandemic

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About