2020
DOI: 10.1515/9781501750731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Civilizational Imperatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A functional relation can therefore be expected between the polar (poloidal) field of minimum activity epochs and the strengths of the following activity cycles (Schatten et al 1978). A tight correlation of this type is confirmed observationally (Muñoz-Jaramillo et al 2013;Hathaway & Upton 2016) and reproduced by dynamo models (Charbonneau 2020;Kumar et al 2021). The polar field strength is recognised as a robust precursor for solar cycles' strength (Petrovay 2020;Nandy 2021).…”
Section: Large Asymmetry In Grand Minimamentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A functional relation can therefore be expected between the polar (poloidal) field of minimum activity epochs and the strengths of the following activity cycles (Schatten et al 1978). A tight correlation of this type is confirmed observationally (Muñoz-Jaramillo et al 2013;Hathaway & Upton 2016) and reproduced by dynamo models (Charbonneau 2020;Kumar et al 2021). The polar field strength is recognised as a robust precursor for solar cycles' strength (Petrovay 2020;Nandy 2021).…”
Section: Large Asymmetry In Grand Minimamentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Dynamo models with fluctuating parameters are known to show transient epochs of strongly reduced field strength modeling the Grand minima of solar activity (Charbonneau 2020). The epochs of weak magnetic fields usually -though not always -show up-normal NS asymmetry.…”
Section: Large Asymmetry In Grand Minimamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…U.S. colonial rule, with its far-reaching transformational agendas, challenged Moro and Lumad societies, most of whom were accustomed to either limited Spanish interference or, in certain parts of the Mindanaoan interior, complete self-governance. 84 Natives responded to the rationalization and remapping of their lands with suspicion, and at times outright hostility. Moros and Lumad became figures of fear for Americans, who portrayed them as violent and unbeholden to the colonial order of things.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%