2020
DOI: 10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2020.2.8627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CJSoTL at 10: A Quantitative Analysis of Authorship, Genre, and Impact

Abstract: On the occasion of the completion of the tenth volume of The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, we have the opportunity to reflect on the kind of scholarly community that The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning has created through its publication of particular articles. One way to attempt this task is through a quantification of different elements of the journal’s history. While the numbers cannot tell us about the internal life of the journal, analysis of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comprehensive coverage of GS provides a faster integration, greater geographical and multilingual representation, and evidence of scholarly impact beyond journals’ impact rankings, including scientific reports, reports and briefs from university research centers, and so on (Delgado López-Cózar et al 2019 ). The benefits in the case of SoTL impact analysis are particularly evident, as impact on university-based pedagogical guides, Open Educational Resources, and scholarly association resources is clearly within the remit of SoTL work (Murphy 2020 ). To ensure consistency in citational data, Andrew completed the citation data collection in a single 24-h GS-refresh cycle.…”
Section: Review Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comprehensive coverage of GS provides a faster integration, greater geographical and multilingual representation, and evidence of scholarly impact beyond journals’ impact rankings, including scientific reports, reports and briefs from university research centers, and so on (Delgado López-Cózar et al 2019 ). The benefits in the case of SoTL impact analysis are particularly evident, as impact on university-based pedagogical guides, Open Educational Resources, and scholarly association resources is clearly within the remit of SoTL work (Murphy 2020 ). To ensure consistency in citational data, Andrew completed the citation data collection in a single 24-h GS-refresh cycle.…”
Section: Review Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5This phenomenon is an unfortunately common pattern, observed in other institutions with the explicit mission of bilingualism (Murphy, forthcoming). …”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 95%