2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-006-0721-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clad height control in laser solid freeform fabrication using a feedforward PID controller

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Owing to this PCE, which take powder recycling rate into account, both surface roughness and processing time are improved and production velocity reaches values ranging from 2 to 10 cm 3 h À1 . For comparison, the most efficient technologies at the present time have a PCE of 20% (without taking account of powder recycling rate), which corresponds to a production velocity ranging from 0.6 to 3 cm 3 h À1 (Lin and Steen, 1998;Fathi et al, 2007). All energy consumption data during the process are tabulated in Table 2.…”
Section: Clad ò Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to this PCE, which take powder recycling rate into account, both surface roughness and processing time are improved and production velocity reaches values ranging from 2 to 10 cm 3 h À1 . For comparison, the most efficient technologies at the present time have a PCE of 20% (without taking account of powder recycling rate), which corresponds to a production velocity ranging from 0.6 to 3 cm 3 h À1 (Lin and Steen, 1998;Fathi et al, 2007). All energy consumption data during the process are tabulated in Table 2.…”
Section: Clad ò Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Closed loop control well maintained the height of the layer in case of changes in the absorption of the base material. Fathi et al (2007) developed a feedforward PID controller based on a semi-empirical nonlinear model to control the clad height. They controlled the cladding speed to obtain the desired clad height, while maintaining the laser power and powder feed rate constant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking advantage of variations in intensity of each spectral range with working distance, due to chromatic distortions, they designed a height control system and coupled it with a laser-power controller based on pyrometer measurements of melt pool temperature. Fathi et al (2006) utilized a more conventional, charge-coupled device (CCD) imaging sensors to assess the influence of various process conditions on deposition height, and then utilized system identification techniques to determine a dynamic system model. With this, they were able to construct PID controllers both with and without an additional feedforward term (based on the identified system dynamics).…”
Section: Deposition Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%