2015
DOI: 10.1080/01639625.2014.1004036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Claiming, Resisting, and Exempting Pathology in the Identities of Self-Injurers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, self‐identifying strongly as someone who self‐harms might be an important factor in maintenance of such problems. Qualitative research extends our understanding by illustrating how this self‐identity is idiosyncratic and varies from person to person (Breen et al , 2013; Presson & Rambo, 2016). Consequently, a repertory grid approach to assessing this self‐harming self‐identity may be beneficial as it allows for idiosyncrasy in the definition of the self‐harming self.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Therefore, self‐identifying strongly as someone who self‐harms might be an important factor in maintenance of such problems. Qualitative research extends our understanding by illustrating how this self‐identity is idiosyncratic and varies from person to person (Breen et al , 2013; Presson & Rambo, 2016). Consequently, a repertory grid approach to assessing this self‐harming self‐identity may be beneficial as it allows for idiosyncrasy in the definition of the self‐harming self.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Since the publication of Favazza's "Bodies Under Siege (1987)", theoretical and practical discussions on why individuals engage in self-harm have gained significance due to the growing clinical interest in self-harming behaviors. Regardless of whether the individual is willing to admit to self-harm, some researchers have discussed self-harm behaviors as a disease, some as a symptom of a psychological disorder, and some as a reflection of popular culture (Presson and Rambo 2016). Despite this interest, the existing literature lacks an inclusive approach to defining, classifying, assessing, and understanding the prevalence, preferences, and motivations behind self-harm behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%