2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clam farmers and Oystercatchers: Effects of the degradation of Lanice conchilega beds by shellfish farming on the spatial distribution of shorebirds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…S1 in the Supplement), showing much more sparsely connected food webs in bare sand sites. The AMI, which assesses the developmental status of an ecosystem and quantifies how orderly and coherently food web flows are connected, is indeed highest for reef areas, which is consistent with the stabilising effect of the ecosystem engineering activities of L. conchilega (Godet et al 2009, Rabaut et al 2009). The higher AMI values resulting from the stabilised conditions within the reef are in line with the AMI values measured in the absence of resuspension of the microphyto benthic biofilm in the Bay of Marennes-Oléron (Saint-Béat et al 2014).…”
Section: Network Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…S1 in the Supplement), showing much more sparsely connected food webs in bare sand sites. The AMI, which assesses the developmental status of an ecosystem and quantifies how orderly and coherently food web flows are connected, is indeed highest for reef areas, which is consistent with the stabilising effect of the ecosystem engineering activities of L. conchilega (Godet et al 2009, Rabaut et al 2009). The higher AMI values resulting from the stabilised conditions within the reef are in line with the AMI values measured in the absence of resuspension of the microphyto benthic biofilm in the Bay of Marennes-Oléron (Saint-Béat et al 2014).…”
Section: Network Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…In the early of 2010, the Yantai government gradually removed most of the raft culture to achieve a better landscape for tourism along the coastal zone of Sishili Bay. Several studies had shown the negative impact on the environment from aquaculture, including the effects of waste products on benthic and planktonic communities (Primavera, 2006;Borja et al, 2009c), the spread of pests (Forrest et al, 2009), the effects of increased biodeposition (Canford et al, 2009) and functional value of coastal ecosystem (Godet et al, 2009). Although we could not get the quantitative assessment of the effect of removing raft culture upon the ES of coastal water in the present work, raft culture removal is certainly to be beneficial for water and benthic quality in this area in the long run.…”
Section: The Reasons For the Improving Es In Coastal Water Of Yantaimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other types, however, might have long-term effects on the environment, such as changes to benthic engineers, and indirectly birds, or via the re-suspension of anoxic sediment and modification of sediment composition (Coen 1995, Kaiser et al 1996, Spencer et al 1997, Pranovi et al 2003, Badino et al 2004, Toupoint et al 2008, Godet et al 2009). The modified tulip harvester used at Chuckanut Shellfish farm was not found to have negative effects on benthos or sediment quality, based on the data collected at the same time as this study.…”
Section: Individual Clam Growth Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%