Clarifying and Capturing “Trust” in Relation to Science Education: Dimensions of Trustworthiness within Schools and Associations with Equitable Student Achievement

Abstract

Science education reform may fall short of its potential to reduce educational disparities if the challenges are interpreted using strictly reductionist approaches. Taking a cue from school effectiveness research and reframing our approach using systems thinking, this study examined school-level variables associated with equitable science achievement. In particular, this study explores the concept of trust in relation to science education. Building upon a substantial body of research literature, we offer refined conceptualizations of schoolwide trust along with the findings that trust fluctuates according to the type of interpersonal relationship, that teacher views of the school principal’s trustworthiness are considerably more variable than views of fellow teachers’ trustworthiness, and that schoolwide science achievement is associated with perceptions of the school principal’s trustworthiness. This study supports the view that trustworthy professional relationships are one of several complementary organizational resources that promote effective and equitable science education. Moreover, our study identified aspects of school trust corresponding to school-level student science outcomes, and these differed from results reported elsewhere for math and reading/language-arts achievement

A closer look at US schools: What characteristics are associated with scientific literacy? A multivariate multilevel analysis using PISA 2015

“…Social networks in schools offer connections for individuals to access “resources and forms of support” (Stanton‐Salazar, 2004, p. 18), aiding students emotionally, socially, and economically (Coleman, 1988). In the context of science learning, Smetana et al (2016) examined professional relationships in schools in association with equitable science achievement. The authors found that positive trust of fellow teachers and teachers' perceptions of principal dependability both contributed to a supportive teaching environment and, in turn, positively affected equitable science achievement.…”

Fostering sustainable improvements in science education: An analysis through four frames

“…Otherwise learned strategies may be short-lived. Similarly, organizational factors in schools contribute significantly to student outcomes (Smetana, Wenner, Settlage, & Mccoach, 2016) and the uptake of new policies (Marco-Bujosa, & Levy, 2016), so they provide an important complement to studies focused on classroom teaching and learning. Thus, attending the organizational factors and culture is important, as it sets the stage for changes in instructional practices to be sustained.…”

Examining Elementary School Science Achievement Gaps Using an Organizational and Leadership Perspective

“…For example, while “trust” is typically portrayed as infused throughout schools (Bryk & Schneider, ), the data demonstrate that trust is not a unitary force but instead takes various forms (Mayer, Davis, & Schoorman, ). The Principal Dependability and Other Teachers' Trustworthiness each captured “trust” with response patterns distinct from one another (Smetana, Wenner, Settlage, & McCoach, ). Similarly, rather than a one‐dimensional view of leadership, teachers hold a multifaceted perspectives about the roles of the building principal: the managerial aspects of their principal's job (within Principal Dependability) were in a category distinct from instructional leadership (from Supports for Science Teaching), both of which were statistically distinct from Principal Advocacy for Equity.…”