2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-006-0269-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clarifying the Associations Between Language and Social Development in Autism: A Study of Non-native Phoneme Recognition

Abstract: Autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) are characterized by correlated deficiencies in social and language development. This study explored a fundamental aspect of auditory information processing (AIP) that is dependent on social experience and critical to early language development: the ability to compartmentalize close-sounding speech sounds into singular phonemes. We examined this ability by assessing whether close-sounding non-native language phonemes were more likely to be perceived as disparate sounds by schoo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
15
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…People with ASD also find faces less salient than do people without ASD [54][56], so infants who go on to develop ASD might have impoverished visual input during the process of learning native phoneme categories. The only experimental evidence of phoneme categorization in ASD comes from a study that examined foreign speech contrasts [57]. Although this study found that there were no group differences in performance, it cannot address the issue of specialization because it did not compare perception of foreign and native speech sound categories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…People with ASD also find faces less salient than do people without ASD [54][56], so infants who go on to develop ASD might have impoverished visual input during the process of learning native phoneme categories. The only experimental evidence of phoneme categorization in ASD comes from a study that examined foreign speech contrasts [57]. Although this study found that there were no group differences in performance, it cannot address the issue of specialization because it did not compare perception of foreign and native speech sound categories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Younger infants show increased response over an initial positive ERP component (P150) and a secondary negative component (N250) to the deviant relative to the standard regardless of whether the stimuli are used contrastively in their native language; by 10-13 months, this increase is restricted to deviant stimuli that are phonemically distinct from the standard in their native language, suggesting a perceptual loss of the irrelevant contrasts (Rivera-Gaxiola, et al, 2005). There is mixed evidence for whether older children with ASD show the appropriate ‘lack’ of ability to distinguish non-native phonemic contrasts (Constantino, et al, 2007; but see DePape, Hall, Tillmann, & Trainor, 2012), and the developmental trajectory of perceptual narrowing in infants at-risk for ASD remains unknown. Importantly, in typical development this perceptual narrowing depends on exposure to and social engagement with a live speaker (Kuhl, 2007; Kuhl, Tsao, & Liu, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have reported group differences in pitch perception between individuals with an ASD diagnosis with vs. without a history of early‐language delay (Bonnel et al., ). However, most studies find no association between pitch perception and current language skills in ASD at age of 10 (Heaton et al., ), and no special sensitivity to non‐native phonological contrasts in ASD at 12 (Constantino et al., ). Perhaps developmental processes such as joint attention and social engagement intervene, such that pitch perception shapes early ‐language development, but has less measurable influence on later language skills.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%