2014 International Conference on Interactive Mobile Communication Technologies and Learning (IMCL2014) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/imctl.2014.7011121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clarifying the digital content output formats for mobile learning in higher education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The European Commission emphasized the need to “rethink education,” with MOOCs being an important open and accessible training format [ 22 ]. However, a set of recommendations need to be considered in developing these MOOCs to ensure quality criteria are met [ 19 , 20 , 23 ]. For the design and development of this MOOC, all the quality-related recommended items were considered, such as course overview and introduction, learning objectives, assessment and measurement, instructional materials, learning activities and learner interaction, course technology, learner support, accessibility and usability, navigation, syllabus, instructor availability, and student input [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The European Commission emphasized the need to “rethink education,” with MOOCs being an important open and accessible training format [ 22 ]. However, a set of recommendations need to be considered in developing these MOOCs to ensure quality criteria are met [ 19 , 20 , 23 ]. For the design and development of this MOOC, all the quality-related recommended items were considered, such as course overview and introduction, learning objectives, assessment and measurement, instructional materials, learning activities and learner interaction, course technology, learner support, accessibility and usability, navigation, syllabus, instructor availability, and student input [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%