2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2009.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clarifying the link between acculturation experiences and parent–child relationships among families in cultural transition: The promise of contemporary critiques of acculturation psychology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study is, to our knowledge, the first one to empirically examine the contention that becoming multicultural is an embodied process (Tardif-Williams & Fisher, 2009). Furthermore, this study provides evidence that RSA represents a unique physiological index of individual differences in social engagement capacities, which likely also exerts influence on affective, cognitive, and behavioural processes promoting an approach-oriented stance toward a new culture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is, to our knowledge, the first one to empirically examine the contention that becoming multicultural is an embodied process (Tardif-Williams & Fisher, 2009). Furthermore, this study provides evidence that RSA represents a unique physiological index of individual differences in social engagement capacities, which likely also exerts influence on affective, cognitive, and behavioural processes promoting an approach-oriented stance toward a new culture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In categorizing the traits that Korean immigrant parents endorse as either adhering to collectivistic or individualistic cultural scripts, the use of scales as two separate measures may implicitly reject the idea that the acculturative process itself creates a new, blended culture with its own cultural scripts (Tardif-Williams & Fisher, 2009) that are neither fully collectivistic nor fully individualistic. The results, which indicate that the items used do not likely work as a coherent scale, may suggest that a bilinear scale – or a scale that simultaneously measures the endorsement of the idealized cultural traits of the traditional and the mainstream cultures – may not alone adequately reflect the impact of acculturation on the endorsement of cultural traits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We argue that shortcomings in the conceptualization and operationalization of acculturation likely account for the many contradictory findings in this area of research. Widely-used methodologies to characterize acculturation in the context of studies of both physical (Abraído-Lanza et al, 2006; Berry, 1998; Comer, 2003; Hunt et al, 2004; Lopez-Class et al, 2011; Schwartz et al, 2010) and mental health outcomes (Berry, 2009; Chirkov, 2009; Gonzales et al, 2002; Tardif-Williams & Fisher, 2009; Ward, 2008) have been criticized. We build upon those previous critiques, summarize major inadequacies from past studies, and suggest alternative approaches that would enhance the quality of research in this area (Table 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%