2005
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.745826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Class Action Settlements: An Opt-In Proposal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Discontinue the proceeding as a group proceeding 205 • Exercising its powers to set aside settlement 206 Bronsteen is of the view that reliance upon the judiciary to effectively control conflicts of interest under these powers is over sanguine. 207 According to Bronsteen, judges have significant personal and institutional incentives to permit settlements to clear their decks of workload and improve court efficiency. Bronsteen also argues that judges are ill-equipped to evaluate the reasonableness and fairness of settlements because of the lack of a market in legal claims.…”
Section: Dealing With Conflict Of Interest Between Class Membersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Discontinue the proceeding as a group proceeding 205 • Exercising its powers to set aside settlement 206 Bronsteen is of the view that reliance upon the judiciary to effectively control conflicts of interest under these powers is over sanguine. 207 According to Bronsteen, judges have significant personal and institutional incentives to permit settlements to clear their decks of workload and improve court efficiency. Bronsteen also argues that judges are ill-equipped to evaluate the reasonableness and fairness of settlements because of the lack of a market in legal claims.…”
Section: Dealing With Conflict Of Interest Between Class Membersmentioning
confidence: 99%