“…Beier (1985: 4) terms it. Historical vagrancy legislation served myriad purposes including, but not limited to: concerns about work, discipline and labour, especially relating to the movements of labourers (see, Beier, 1974; 1985; 2008; Davies, 1966; Rogers, 1994; Harring, 1977; Higbie, 2008; Pitsula, 1980); the visibility and difficulties of attending to poverty (see, Pound, 1971; Slack, 1974; Hitchcock, 2001); crime and criminality, especially concerning what was called a “criminal” or a “dangerous‐class” (see, Aydelotte, 1967/1913; Fuller, 1936; Rogers, 1991; Adler, 1986); and leisure, popular morality and public health (see, Ribton‐Turner, 1887). Despite this eclecticism what is common and underpins these concerns is the unequivocal fact that vagrancy was a serious social problem to contemporaries.…”