2011
DOI: 10.1097/mrr.0b013e3283460e7d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Class Evolution Tree

Abstract: The aim of our study was to develop a graphical tool that can be used in addition to standard statistical criteria to support decisions on the number of classes in explorative categorical latent variable modeling for rehabilitation research. Data from two rehabilitation research projects were used. In the first study, a latent profile analysis was carried out in patients with cancer receiving an inpatient rehabilitation program to identify prototypical combinations of treatment elements. In the second study, g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Entropy values indicate how well classes are separated with values N0.8 indicating good separation (Tein, Coxe, & Cham, 2013). Model selection was based on fit indices as well as practical interpretability and research objective as recommended (Jung & Wickrama, 2008;Kriston et al, 2011;Muthén & Muthén, 2000). Models with 1 through 9 classes were tested using MPlus Version 5 (Muthén & Muthén, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Entropy values indicate how well classes are separated with values N0.8 indicating good separation (Tein, Coxe, & Cham, 2013). Model selection was based on fit indices as well as practical interpretability and research objective as recommended (Jung & Wickrama, 2008;Kriston et al, 2011;Muthén & Muthén, 2000). Models with 1 through 9 classes were tested using MPlus Version 5 (Muthén & Muthén, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 7-class model was suggested by BIC and a 9-class model by AIC. Because different statistical fit indices suggested different class solutions research objective and practical interpretability received more weight in deciding on the number of classes as recommended (Jung & Wickrama, 2008;Kriston et al, 2011;Muthén & Muthén, 2000). In the 2-class solution, 283 subjects (89.6%) were assigned to one class.…”
Section: Number Of Latent Classesmentioning
confidence: 99%