1997
DOI: 10.1006/jnth.1997.2048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Class Formations and Higher Dimensional Local Class Field Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…-The explicit approach of Fesenko [7][8][9] is based on extending the local abelian Hasse reciprocity law construction of Neukirch-Iwasawa [39,40] and on extending the local norm residue symbol construction of Hazewinkel [17] to the setting of n-dimensional local fields; -Kato's approach [22,25] is cohomological and extends Tate's construction of the local abelian Hasse reciprocity law [48]; -Koya on the other hand [30][31][32], using Lichtenbaum's complexes Z(i) [34], generalizes class formation approach of local abelian class field theory to construct the local abelian 2-dimensional class field theory, which is extended and streamlined by Spiess [47] to the n-dimensional setting; -The final approach, due to Parshin [42,44,45], which is the genesis of the whole program, generalizes Kawada-Satake construction of local abelian class field theory [29] to construct the local abelian n-dimensional class field theory in positive characteristic. In this work we shall review Fesenko's explicit approach, where as stated above, the idea is to generalize the classical Neukirch-Iwasawa and Hazewinkel methods to higherdimensional local fields, which will be recalled next with extra care following closely [10,11,13].…”
Section: Local Abelian K-theoretic Class Field Theory Of Kato-parshinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-The explicit approach of Fesenko [7][8][9] is based on extending the local abelian Hasse reciprocity law construction of Neukirch-Iwasawa [39,40] and on extending the local norm residue symbol construction of Hazewinkel [17] to the setting of n-dimensional local fields; -Kato's approach [22,25] is cohomological and extends Tate's construction of the local abelian Hasse reciprocity law [48]; -Koya on the other hand [30][31][32], using Lichtenbaum's complexes Z(i) [34], generalizes class formation approach of local abelian class field theory to construct the local abelian 2-dimensional class field theory, which is extended and streamlined by Spiess [47] to the n-dimensional setting; -The final approach, due to Parshin [42,44,45], which is the genesis of the whole program, generalizes Kawada-Satake construction of local abelian class field theory [29] to construct the local abelian n-dimensional class field theory in positive characteristic. In this work we shall review Fesenko's explicit approach, where as stated above, the idea is to generalize the classical Neukirch-Iwasawa and Hazewinkel methods to higherdimensional local fields, which will be recalled next with extra care following closely [10,11,13].…”
Section: Local Abelian K-theoretic Class Field Theory Of Kato-parshinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Y. Koya [42,43] proved higher dimensional local class field theory using the language of class formations and complexes of Galois modules. His methods were further developed by M. Speiss [69,70], who gave the first proof that if L/F is a finite Galois extension (not necessarily abelian) of n-dimensional local fields, then…”
Section: Higher Dimensional Local Class Field Theory: Statement and S...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the topological approach, with which this work is concerned, the major achievement is local higher class field theory. This theory was established in the general case by Kato [20], [21], [22]; Fesenko [9], [10]; Spiess [29] and others. It uses Milnor K-groups endowed with a certain topology and the higher reciprocity map in order to describe abelian extensions of a higher local field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%