2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2014.09.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classes of hypercomplex polynomials of discrete variable based on the quasi-monomiality principle

Abstract: With the aim of derive a quasi-monomiality formulation in the context of discrete hypercomplex variables, one will amalgamate through a Clifford-algebraic structure of signature (0, n) the umbral calculus framework with Lie-algebraic symmetries. The exponential generating function (EGF) carrying the continuum Dirac operator D = n j=1 e j ∂ xj together with the Lie-algebraic representation of raising and lowering operators acting on the lattice hZ n is used to derive the corresponding hypercomplex polynomials o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As studied in depth by the author in a previous study, the above construction yields as a natural exploitation of an abstract framework involving manipulations of shift‐invariant operators that admit formal series expansions in terms of the time derivative ∂ t as follows: Lt=k=1bktkk!,withbk=[(Lt)ktk]t=0. Such construction looks similar to Constales and De Ridder's work (cf Faustino, Remark 4.1), except that the − i L t operator ( i=1)–appearing quite often on Dirac's equation (cf ,. subsection 5.…”
Section: Problem Setupmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As studied in depth by the author in a previous study, the above construction yields as a natural exploitation of an abstract framework involving manipulations of shift‐invariant operators that admit formal series expansions in terms of the time derivative ∂ t as follows: Lt=k=1bktkk!,withbk=[(Lt)ktk]t=0. Such construction looks similar to Constales and De Ridder's work (cf Faustino, Remark 4.1), except that the − i L t operator ( i=1)–appearing quite often on Dirac's equation (cf ,. subsection 5.…”
Section: Problem Setupmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…As studied in depth by the author in a previous study, 19 the above construction yields as a natural exploitation of an abstract framework involving manipulations of shift-invariant operators that admit formal series expansions in terms of the time derivative t as follows:…”
Section: Problem Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 S n 1 . The other was the construction of a one-to-one mapping between the subspaces Re j e nCj of spin C .n, n/ and the (paravector) subspaces H n 1,n j of the Lorentz pseudo-sphere H n 1,n , by means of the stereographic-like projection (14). That was the main key on the proof of Proposition 2.1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…shows us that D h,α may also be seen as a fractional regularization for the discrete Dirac operators on the lattice h 2 Z n , already considered in the series of papers [16,18,19,20].…”
Section: Discrete Dirac-kähler Vs Discrete Laplacian Let Us Take Nomentioning
confidence: 94%