2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-7166.2010.01033.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classic flaws in clinical CAM research

Abstract: Frequently, CAM research is less than rigorous. This has, of course, many causes. For this review, I have selected a few ‘classic flaws’ of CAM research, which, in my experience, occur regularly and have the potential to mislead us. My hope is that this selection will help the reader to avoid the mistakes I and others have made in the past and, ultimately, will contribute to improvements in CAM research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
references
References 15 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance