Classic Pages of the<i>Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology</i>

Riley, Jeffrey B.

doi:10.1051/ject/200739201

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It has been widely suggested that cardiac surgery centers should participate in prospective registries of good-catch, near-miss, and SAEs related to perfusion or extracorporeal circulation (7)(8)(9)(10)27,28,32,60,64). Professional societies outside of the United States have officially adopted this position and AmSECT has an initiative underway (20,(65)(66)(67).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Developing a Prospective Incident-Reporting System for Clinical Perfusion Practice in the United States

Colligan¹,

Paugh²,

Murtha³

2022

J Extra Corpor Technol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

For nearly 20 years, prominent perfusionists have called for a perfusion-centric prospective incident-reporting system to collect near-miss and patient harm incidents that occur during clinical practice in the United States. In this article, we describe the development of a widely available prospective incident-reporting system for use by perfusionists in the United States. The system was developed in three phases: literature review, system incorporation, and submission for listing as a Patient Safety Organization (PSO). It is anticipated that the knowledge gained from analysis of events contributed to this PSO-protected reporting system will lead to improvements in safety and quality of perfusion services, as well as expanding the understanding of best practices in training, equipment use, system design, and simulation scenarios.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As a result, nearly 20 years have passed since the first calls for its adoption with no such system in place (6)(7)(8). Single center or local systems have been developed and reported previously but widespread use of a prospective incident-reporting system has not been available or used (6,9,10).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%