32nd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference 2014
DOI: 10.2514/6.2014-3257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classical and snapshot forms of the POD technique applied to a helical vortex filament

Abstract: Low-dimensional characteristics of a helical vortex filament from a reduced-scale rotor are investigated using proper orthogonal decomposition (POD). Measurements are captured by way of particle image velocimetry. Experiments are performed on a 1.0 m diameter, single-bladed rotor in hover. The rotor is operated at 1500 RPM, which corresponds to a blade tip chord Reynolds number of 218,000 and a tip Mach number of 0.23. The blade is set to a collective pitch angle of 7.3 • , which resulted in a blade loading (C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When compared with the spatial modes obtained using the snapshot POD method (which also does not force axisymmetry), the general features of the first few most energetic modes were essentially the same (Mula & Tinney 2014).…”
Section: (42)mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…When compared with the spatial modes obtained using the snapshot POD method (which also does not force axisymmetry), the general features of the first few most energetic modes were essentially the same (Mula & Tinney 2014).…”
Section: (42)mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Compounding this lack of clarity is the inconsistent and incompatible use of the terms 'classical POD' and 'snapshot POD'. Some authors use these terms to refer to the methods we are calling spectral and space-only POD, respectively (e.g., Hellström & Smits, 2014;Mula & Tinney, 2014;George, 2017). Others use the name 'classical POD' to refer to space-only POD and 'snapshot POD' to refer to a particular computational shortcut for computing space-only POD modes (e.g., Hilberg et al, 1994;Pinier et al, 2007;Cordier & Bergmann, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be observed in the Fig.16, the vorticity increases with the addition of each fluctuation mode. The first reconstruction covers 33% of the total energy and affects essentially the radial position of the core vortex that has been moved from 0.796 R to 0.808 R. The addition of the second fluctuating mode induces a displacement of core vortex in the axial direction from 0.738 R to 0.727 R. The mode 3 and 4 are clearly responsible for the elliptical deformation of vortex structure as confirmed by Mula and Tinney (2014) in the case of a propeller rotor.…”
Section: Fig 13 Radial Tip Vortex Velocity: (A) Vortex Age 60° (B)mentioning
confidence: 78%