2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-2502-0_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classical Density Functional Theory for Molecular Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in conjunction with mean field approaches like Poisson-Boltzmann (PB) or modified Poisson-Boltzmann (MPB) theory[51,52,53]. An alternative to continuum theories is the rigorous classical density functional theory of liquids[54]; it calculates thermodynamic functions by variational free energy minimization, rendering it computationally more efficient than molecular dynamics simulations.As for the latter, there are currently no reports on explicit simulations of electrochemical interfaces based on QM/MM, as are widely popular in other fields[55].Combination of electronic structure calculations for the electrode region with different treatment of the solvent region results in three main classes of FPEC approaches, which are (i) the computational hydrogen electrode (CHE) of Nørskov, Rossmeisl and others [56, 57, 58], (ii) a standard approach (DFT-CSM/MPB) that combines electronic DFT with mean field theories for the electrolyte region, pioneered by Otani and Sugino [59] and developed further by Jinnouchi and Anderson [49] as well as Dabo, Bonnet and Marzari [60], and (iii) joint density functional theory (JDFT) that combines electronic and classical DFT for the respective regions [35, 61]. All of these approaches and their numerous derivatives (too many to cite) are heavily preoccupied with two crucial questions: how to fix a potential scale and how to maintain electroneutrality in the system?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in conjunction with mean field approaches like Poisson-Boltzmann (PB) or modified Poisson-Boltzmann (MPB) theory[51,52,53]. An alternative to continuum theories is the rigorous classical density functional theory of liquids[54]; it calculates thermodynamic functions by variational free energy minimization, rendering it computationally more efficient than molecular dynamics simulations.As for the latter, there are currently no reports on explicit simulations of electrochemical interfaces based on QM/MM, as are widely popular in other fields[55].Combination of electronic structure calculations for the electrode region with different treatment of the solvent region results in three main classes of FPEC approaches, which are (i) the computational hydrogen electrode (CHE) of Nørskov, Rossmeisl and others [56, 57, 58], (ii) a standard approach (DFT-CSM/MPB) that combines electronic DFT with mean field theories for the electrolyte region, pioneered by Otani and Sugino [59] and developed further by Jinnouchi and Anderson [49] as well as Dabo, Bonnet and Marzari [60], and (iii) joint density functional theory (JDFT) that combines electronic and classical DFT for the respective regions [35, 61]. All of these approaches and their numerous derivatives (too many to cite) are heavily preoccupied with two crucial questions: how to fix a potential scale and how to maintain electroneutrality in the system?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of new systems, as soon as they become technologically and scientifically relevant, requires continual development of new methods to improve Systems involving liquids, such as electrochemical interfaces or solvated biomolecules, are particularly challenging for DFT calculations, requiring thermodynamic sampling of several thousands of atomic configurations in ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations [8]. Joint density-functional theory (JDFT) was proposed as a theoretical framework to address this issue by combining electronic DFT with classical DFT of liquids [9] to directly compute equilibrium properties of quantum-mechanically described solutes in diverse solvent environments [10]. Bringing this method to fruition required the simultaneous development of physical models (free energy functionals) of liquids and their interaction with electrons, algorithms to perform variational free-energy minimization and code that tightly and efficiently coupled these new models with electronic DFT.…”
Section: Motivation and Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moving down the scale of accuracy and cost, we can consider solvent density without the need for simulations of explicit water molecules by utilising an integral equation theory model with a suitable free energy functional, e.g. 3D-RISM with the UC, PC, or PC+ functional (Misin et al 2015;Misin et al 2016;Sergiievskyi et al, 2015;Palmer et al 2010), or classical molecular density functional theory (Wu, 2017), which describes the density of molecules in a fluid rather than the more familiar use of DFT to describe the density of electrons in a molecule. This can provide an excellent compromise between cost and precision.…”
Section: Computing Hydration Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%