2009
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2008.002451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classical Hodgkin's lymphoma in adults: guidelines of the Italian Society of Hematology, the Italian Society of Experimental Hematology, and the Italian Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation on initial work-up, management, and follow-up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
(137 reference statements)
0
38
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…This figure should be compared with NRM from other series of patients both grafted from HLA identical siblings or unrelated donors: 18,19,20 the average NRM is reported to be 50% for myeloablative regimens and 21% for reduced intensity conditioning. 21 In the San Martino Unit, we could identify 21 HD patients receiving an allograft from an HLA identical sibling and 16 from an alternative donor: their NRM was, respectively, 33% and 37%, with no significant difference according to the intensity of the conditioning regimen. The actuarial 3-year survival of alternative donor transplants was 30%, compared with 77% in this report.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This figure should be compared with NRM from other series of patients both grafted from HLA identical siblings or unrelated donors: 18,19,20 the average NRM is reported to be 50% for myeloablative regimens and 21% for reduced intensity conditioning. 21 In the San Martino Unit, we could identify 21 HD patients receiving an allograft from an HLA identical sibling and 16 from an alternative donor: their NRM was, respectively, 33% and 37%, with no significant difference according to the intensity of the conditioning regimen. The actuarial 3-year survival of alternative donor transplants was 30%, compared with 77% in this report.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only primary refractory younger patients or patients showing an early relapse following the completion of treatment are referred to more specialized hematologic centres. Furthermore, the majority of patients are not enrolled in prospective clinical trials and receive therapy according to well-established clinical guidelines (24). The aim of this retrospective study was to review the current management of HL in a northern Italian region (Liguria), with special emphasis on long-term outcome and toxicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,37 For patients belonging to the standard-risk group with any additional risk factors (bulky relapse, relapse in irradiated site, B symptoms), the expert panel recommends the strategy proposed for the intermediate-risk group, consisting of BEAM and ASCT after having obtained chemosensitivity by second-line chemotherapy. For any patient from the standard-risk group with chemoresistance to second-line treatment, the expert panel recommends a double transplant strategy provided that the patient eventually responds to third-line regimen.…”
Section: Standard-risk Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Demonstrated responses to donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) and a trend toward a lower relapse rate after allogeneic SCT than after ASCT, especially when chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurs, are direct and indirect arguments for a GVHL effect. [37][38][39] Because of the negative aspect of treatment-related mortality (TRM) of myeloablative conditioning regimens, reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens have emerged as a potential option with acceptable TRM and long-term response. 40,41 Importantly, several studies have shown that chemosensitivity at transplantation remains a major predictor of outcome of RIC allogeneic SCT (RIC-allo).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%