2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-00834-4_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classical Logical Versus Quantum Conceptual Thought: Examples in Economics, Decision Theory and Concept Theory

Abstract: Inspired by a quantum mechanical formalism to model concepts and their disjunctions and conjunctions, we put forward in this paper a specific hypothesis. Namely that within human thought two superposed layers can be distinguished: (i) a layer given form by an underlying classical deterministic process, incorporating essentially logical thought and its indeterministic version modeled by classical probability theory; (ii) a layer given form under influence of the totality of the surrounding conceptual landscape,… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
66
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
66
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For concepts and categories in the expanse of natural language have already been shown to be adequately modeled by quantum-like models. The extended contexts in a personal mind were previously denoted ‘conceptual landscapes’ by Aerts and D’Hooghe (2009), and play a role in the categorization of linguistic concepts. The effect of the context is to collapse the state of the sign into a meaningful concept—an ‘eigen’ state with respect to the given context 1.…”
Section: The Nature Of Aesthetic Signsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For concepts and categories in the expanse of natural language have already been shown to be adequately modeled by quantum-like models. The extended contexts in a personal mind were previously denoted ‘conceptual landscapes’ by Aerts and D’Hooghe (2009), and play a role in the categorization of linguistic concepts. The effect of the context is to collapse the state of the sign into a meaningful concept—an ‘eigen’ state with respect to the given context 1.…”
Section: The Nature Of Aesthetic Signsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the feature of 'typicality' behaves weirdly with respect to the conjunction, in the sense that the conjunction 'pet-fish' rates higher in typicality than the single components 'pet' and 'fish', for specific entities such as a 'guppy' or a 'gold-fish'. In our Brussels group, we have worked out quantum models for the guppy effect in great detail, and we believe that it is an archetype for what happens when the conjunction fallacy manifests in experimental situations, leading to a much better understanding of the phenomenon than in traditional explanations, where it is merely classified as a probability judgment error [26,27,28,29]. This also because, a much less known probabilistic variant of the original pet-fish problem, using 'membership weights' instead of 'typicalities', has also been abundantly tested, giving rise to analogous behaviors for the conjunction [30,31,32].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of the above-mentioned study disagree with this view and claim that their experiments show that double conjunction fallacies are no exception and appear abundantly whenever some specific cognitive situations arise. What is interesting is that in the quantum model of the pet-fish situation that we developed in our group [17,26,27,28,29], the single and double conjunction fallacies can be modeled in a very natural way, and result both from a same fundamental mechanism, which we plan to use also as an explanation for, and to further the analysis of, the situations put forward in [34].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [34], the proposed encoding was based on the use of the stereographic projection [6]. In particular, it allows to unequivocally map any point r = (r 1 , r 2 , r 3 ) on the surface of a radius-one sphere S 2 (except for the north pole) into an arbitrary point x = [x (1) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%