2014
DOI: 10.3390/axioms3020244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classical Probability and Quantum Outcomes

Abstract: There is a contact problem between classical probability and quantum outcomes. Thus, a standard result from classical probability on the existence of joint distributions ultimately implies that all quantum observables must commute. An essential task here is a closer identification of this conflict based on deriving commutativity from the weakest possible assumptions, and showing that stronger assumptions in some of the existing no-go proofs are unnecessary. An example of an unnecessary assumption in such proof… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 2 The relation between the non-existence of the joint distribution of two observables and their incompatibility is subtle and depends critically on the fact that a joint distribution is defined in terms of a particular state W . See Gudder (1968), Gudder (1979), Malley (2004), Malley and Fine (2005), Malley (2006), Malley and Fletcher (2008), Nelson (1967) and Varadarajan (1962). 3 For a detailed formulation of quantum probability theory see, for example, Beltrametti and Cassinelli (1981), Bub (1974) or Hughes (1989).…”
Section: The Lüders Rulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 2 The relation between the non-existence of the joint distribution of two observables and their incompatibility is subtle and depends critically on the fact that a joint distribution is defined in terms of a particular state W . See Gudder (1968), Gudder (1979), Malley (2004), Malley and Fine (2005), Malley (2006), Malley and Fletcher (2008), Nelson (1967) and Varadarajan (1962). 3 For a detailed formulation of quantum probability theory see, for example, Beltrametti and Cassinelli (1981), Bub (1974) or Hughes (1989).…”
Section: The Lüders Rulementioning
confidence: 99%