2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2015.260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classical Scaling Revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, d(z \ast , z j ) \leq \lambda for some z j \in Z m by the above algorithm, and we get from (25), (26), (27) that…”
Section: Ijmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, d(z \ast , z j ) \leq \lambda for some z j \in Z m by the above algorithm, and we get from (25), (26), (27) that…”
Section: Ijmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this paper, we use a different approach to accelerate the Bregman projections algorithm. Inspired by the efficiency of low-rank approximations of geodesic distance matrices [26,27], we propose computing a low-rank approximation \bfitR 1 \bfitR t 2 of exp( - \bfitC /\varepsi ) where \bfitR 1 , \bfitR 2 are n \times m matrices with m \ll n. This approximation can be used to accelerate the Bregman projections algorithm by reducing the complexity of each iteration to O(mn).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For meshes with up 15 × 10 3 vertices, the entire distance matrices were precomputed and stored in memory. For larger meshes, we used the distance approximation method suggested in [SAZK15] using a truncated geodesic distance basis of size 50 with 100 samples. This approximation tends to produce larger relative errors for smaller distances, therefore, in addition to the truncated geodesic distance basis, we pre-computed and stored distances from all vertices to their 10-ring neighbors.…”
Section: Implementation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interpolation operator H is similar but not identical to the BHA interpolation operator P. The difference lies in the fact that P does exact interpolation, meaning that the values at known points (the landmarks b) must be exactly equal to known values. In contrast, H allows some small error at the known points, where the amount of error is controlled by a scalar coefficient µ [21]. It is possible to linearly transform P into H: H = P(M bb + µI l + M bu P u ) −1 µ, where P u is defined as in Equation 6.…”
Section: Fmdsmentioning
confidence: 99%