2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.91.085003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classical versus quantum evolution for a universe with a positive cosmological constant

Abstract: A homogeneous and isotropic cosmological model with a positive cosmological constant is considered. The matter sector is given by a massless scalar field, which can be used as an internal time to deparametrize the theory. The idea is to study and compare the evolutions of a quantum and a classical probability distribution by performing a decomposition of both distributions in their corresponding moments. For the numerical analysis an initial peaked Gaussian state in the volume will be chosen. Furthermore, in o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Writing these expressions in terms of moments, as performed in ( 33)- (34), and truncating the series at secondorder, one ends up with five constants of motion for five variables and the system is thus completely determined. Note that, for convenience, we have defined the conserved quantities as expectation values of powers of differences, like ( Ri − R i ) 2 , instead of expectation values of powers, like R2 i , and with a symmetric ordering of R 1 and R 2 .…”
Section: B Conserved Quantitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Writing these expressions in terms of moments, as performed in ( 33)- (34), and truncating the series at secondorder, one ends up with five constants of motion for five variables and the system is thus completely determined. Note that, for convenience, we have defined the conserved quantities as expectation values of powers of differences, like ( Ri − R i ) 2 , instead of expectation values of powers, like R2 i , and with a symmetric ordering of R 1 and R 2 .…”
Section: B Conserved Quantitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as we mentioned above, there is a particular semiclassical formalism in which a quantum mechanical system can be studied as a classical Hamiltonian system but in an infinite dimensional phase space, where the additional degrees of freedom are directly related to the expectation values of all the infinitely many quantum dispersions [6]. This general formalism was applied to simple models of loop quantum cosmology to show the existence of a quantum bounce at the beginning of the Universe [47][48][49][50]. However, it has also been studied in other systems such as anharmonic oscillators [51], and also two-dimensional systems such as the quantum Kepler problem [52].…”
Section: Effective Equations For the Dynamics Of The Quantum Falling ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as we mentioned above, there is a particular semiclassical formalism in which a quantum mechanical system can be studied as a classical Hamiltonian system but in a infinite dimensional phase space, where the additional degrees of freedom are directly related to the expectation values of all the infinite many quantum dispersions [3]. This formalism was first applied to soluble models of loop quantum cosmology to show the existence of a quantum bounce at the beginning of the universe [13][14][15][16]. However, it has also been studied in other systems such as anharmonic oscillators [17], and also two dimensional systems as the quantum Kepler problem [18].…”
Section: Momentous Effective Formulation Of the Quantum Falling Particlementioning
confidence: 99%