1988
DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.3.1.51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classically conditioned cardiac responses in "old" and "young" Fischer 344 rats.

Abstract: Male and female Fischer 344 rats, 12 or 26-28 months of age, received two sessions of Pavlovian heart rate conditioning, and were compared with same-sex and same-age controls receiving unpaired presentations of the tone conditional stimulus (CS) and the shock unconditional stimulus (US). Older rats of both sexes demonstrated slower acquisition of the heart rate (HR) conditioned response (CR), and smaller magnitude changes than did the younger animals. Control experiments in 6-, 12-, 24-, and 30-month-old anima… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, several researchers have reported that old rabbits show impaired EB conditioning compared with their younger cohorts (Graves & Solomon, 1985; Powell, Buchanan, & Hernandez, 1981; Woodruff-Pak, Lavond, Logan, & Thompson, 1987), and a host of control studies have suggested that these deficits are caused by associative changes, not nonspecific age-related changes, such as impaired UCRs to the CS or UCS. Animal studies also suggest an age-related impairment in HR conditioning, but these data are not as clear-cut because nonassociative controls have not always been performed (e.g., Buchanan & Ginn, 1988; Powell, Buchanan, & Hernandez, 1984). Because the neurobiological substrates for both skeletal and autonomic conditioning are beginning to be understood (see, e.g., Powell, Buchanan, & Gibbs, 1990; Thompson, Donegan, & Lavond, 1988), the use of classical conditioning models in elderly subjects may serve as behavioral markers for age-related changes in these structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, several researchers have reported that old rabbits show impaired EB conditioning compared with their younger cohorts (Graves & Solomon, 1985; Powell, Buchanan, & Hernandez, 1981; Woodruff-Pak, Lavond, Logan, & Thompson, 1987), and a host of control studies have suggested that these deficits are caused by associative changes, not nonspecific age-related changes, such as impaired UCRs to the CS or UCS. Animal studies also suggest an age-related impairment in HR conditioning, but these data are not as clear-cut because nonassociative controls have not always been performed (e.g., Buchanan & Ginn, 1988; Powell, Buchanan, & Hernandez, 1984). Because the neurobiological substrates for both skeletal and autonomic conditioning are beginning to be understood (see, e.g., Powell, Buchanan, & Gibbs, 1990; Thompson, Donegan, & Lavond, 1988), the use of classical conditioning models in elderly subjects may serve as behavioral markers for age-related changes in these structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early studies showed deficits in conditioned suppression in aged rats (Pare, 1969b;Solyom & Miller, 1965), but decrements in footshock sensitivity may partly explain these effects (Pare, 1969a). Previous studies have also shown conditioned bradycardia to increase or remain stable in aged rabbits (Powell et al, 1981(Powell et al, , 1984 but decrease in aged rats (Buchanan & Ginn, 1988). Aging studies of conditioned freezing in rats and mice have typically found no impairments in CS-evoked responses (Doyère, GisquetVerrier, de Marsanich, & Ammassari-Teule, 2000;Houston, Stevenson, McNaughton, & Barnes, 1999;Ohta et al, 2001;Oler & Markus, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that the rate of development oftolerance to a variety of drugs is slower in older than in younger subjects (see, e.g., Mayfield et ai., 1992;Nicak & Kohut, 1978;Nozaki, Akera, Lee, & Brody, 1975;Swartzwelder, Richardson, Markwiese-Foerch, Wilson, & Little, 1998;York & Chan, 1994) is consistent with both the conditioning analysis of tolerance and results of previous research concerning glucose enhancement of CR formation. The acquisition of classically 'conditioned responses is slower in older than in younger rats and humans (see, e.g., Buchanan & Ginn, 1988;Kubanis & Zornetzer, 1981;Prescott, Buchanan, & Powell, 1989;Weiss & Thompson, 1991;Zornetzer, Thompson, & Rogers, 1982). IfCRs partially mediate tolerance, it would indeed be expected that the rate of tolerance acquisition to a variety of drugs would be inversely related to the subject's age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%