Classics of infectious diseases: A bibliometric analysis of the 100 most cited articles

Self Cite

In our study, the 101 most cited publications in the field of “Immunology” in the Web of Science (WoS) database were evaluated bibliometrically. The “WoS” database “advanced mode" was used in this study. A search was conducted in the field of “Immunology.” The top 101 most-cited publications were then identified. The total number of citations of the publications, annual number of citations, authors, information of the study, and journal were analyzed. There were 1,191,384 publications in the field of “Immunology” in the WoS between 1975 and 2023. The total citation average of the 101 most cited publications was 3765.69 ± 4142.7 and the annual citation average was 180.91 ± 133.1. The first 3 subjects in the first 101 articles were listed as “apoptosis–cancer immunology” (14.85%), “monocyte-macrophage”(14.58%), and “T-cell”(13.86%), respectively. The 3 journals in which the studies were published the most were determined as “Annual Review of Immunology” (18.81%), “Nature Reviews Immunology” (17.82%) and “Nature Immunology” (10.89%). Only 1.98% of publications were published after 2014. A significant relationship was found between the study type, impact factor of the journal, continent of journal and publisher, funding status, year of publication, and number of citations per year (P < .05). Our study is the first to analyze the top 101 most-cited studies in the field of “immunology" and their citation characteristics. The study’s journals, publishers, publication features, funding status, and publication year affect the number of citations per year.

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 72%

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 51%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 56%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Evaluation of the 101 most cited immunology articles: A bibliometric analysis

Hanci

2023

Self Cite

“…These limitations are not specific to our study; all studies using this methodology have the same limitation. [ 18 , 19 ] Third limitation is, recent articles with high impact are not included in this study because it takes time to have enough citations for being in the top cited 100 publication list. The last limitation of this study is, not all of the publications about general anesthesia-induced neurotoxicity were evaluated.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The bibliometric analysis of most cited 100 papers in anesthesia-induced neurotoxicity

Ocmen,

Erdost,

Hanci

2023

Anesthesia-induced neurotoxicity is a major concern for anesthetists for more than 20 years. Many experimental and clinical studies have been conducted on this topic since late 1990s. However, bibliometric analysis of these papers has not been reported. In this study, we aimed to analyze the 100 most cited articles on anesthesia-induced neurotoxicity. It was planned as cross-sectional study. On January 30, 2023, we searched the “Web of Science (WOS)” database for anesthesia-induced neurotoxicity and most cited 100 papers about this topic were obtained. Data such as authors’ names, year of publication, name of the journal, type of paper, and citation numbers were analyzed. The most cited 100 papers were read by the investigators, and the anesthetic, animal type in experimental studies, any protective agent and the method for detecting neurotoxicity used in the studies were also noted. There were 75 articles and 22 reviews in the 100 most cited articles. We found that most of the papers in most cited 100 list were published between 2010 to 1024. Most of the papers (11%) were from Harvard University and almost half of the papers (49%) were published in Anesthesiology. A great number of studies were performed in newborns or early childhood (85.5%) and inhalational anesthetics (54.7%) were the most studied anesthetic type. Most of the most cited 100 papers were published in Q1 journals (P = .012) and the continent of the most journals in this list was America (P = .014). The median total and annual citation numbers of funded papers were statistically significantly higher (P < .001 and P < .001 respectively). Anesthesia-induced neurotoxicity is very important, especially for pediatric anesthetists. This study is the first to conduct a bibliometric analysis of the most cited 100 publications on this field. Although there was a gap in the publications about this topic during COVID-19 pandemic, we believe that there will be many more publications on anesthesia-induced neurotoxicity since the mechanism, outcome and possible protection are still unknown.

Top-50 cited articles on cysticercosis and neurocysticercosis

Gonzalez-Alcaide,

Sosa,

Valero-Samper

et al. 2024

Background: Identifying the most highly cited papers in a given field can help researchers and professionals understand the milestones and research areas that are generating the most impact. This study aimed to identify and describe the 50 most frequently cited manuscripts on cysticercosis and neurocysticercosis. Methods: We identified the 50 most cited papers (articles and reviews) on cysticercosis and neurocysticercosis from the MEDLINE database and indexed in Web of Science-Core Collection, analyzing their bibliographic and content characteristics. Results: The most cited documents comprised 29 (58%) original articles and 21 (42%) reviews, the bulk of which were narrative reviews (n = 17), with a negligible presence of other types of reviews with high-level scientific evidence. Six journals published 42% of the articles. In addition to the USA, Mexico and Peru were prominent countries of origin among leading researchers. The main research topics were the central nervous system and epilepsy on the one hand, and diagnostic and therapeutic approaches on the other. Conclusion: Our findings shed light on the dissemination of knowledge about cysticercosis and neurocysticercosis in recent decades, identifying the most highly cited contributions that have driven research in the field.