Classification and Assignment within Pride (CLASP): A Recruit Assignment Model.

Kroeker, Leonard; Rafacz, Bernard A.

doi:10.21236/ada136907

Cited by 5 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…?I" °''t recruiter to another. This lack of consistency in allocation decisions than others ^'^"^^ accession rates: Some enlisted guarantee programs fill much faster (Kroeker & Rafacz, 1983). Among the objectives to be achieved by the application of the model was the allocation of enlisted program options Isee Table 1) at rates compatible with managerial directives.…”

Section: ^ °mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To incorporate this computer program and, thus, to generate payoff values' for person-program matches, system flow charts were prepared and an allocation computer program was developed (Kroeker &: Folchi, 1984). Each component was designed in modular form so that it could easily be integrated into the system (see also Kroeker &: Rafacz, 1983). The allocation system incorporating the program fill-rate utility component was used to generate assignment payoff values falling into a range of 1-100, as illustrated by a hypothetical example in Table 3.…”

Section: Allocation Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The allocation system incorporating the program fill-rate utility component was used to generate assignment payoff values falling into a range of 1-100, as illustrated by a hypothetical example in Table 3. Kroeker & Rafacz, 1983).…”

Section: Allocation Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A DI score reflects the degree of expected proficiency resulting from a particular person-program match. Ward (1959) and Kroeker and Rafacz (1983) have discussed the role of the DI mean in the allocation procedure more fully. The simulated assignments were examined and compared to the actual assignments (AA) made by recruiters and recorded in the data base described earlier.…”

Section: Recruit Assignment Simulationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Marine Corps Recruit Classification: The Program Fill-Rate Component

Kroeker¹,

Folchi²

1985

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A fill-rate component was developed and tested for the Marine Corps' program management module, which governs the allocation of recruit applicants to enlisted program guarantees within the Automated Recruit Management System (ARMS). Marine Corps policy directives led to the formulation of a utility component capable of meeting program fill-rate requirements. The resulting component was tested by simulating recruit assignments and assessing model performance characteristics. Programs filled at nearly uniform rates for all 9 sample months examined. The results of assignment by model (ABM) were compared to actual assignment (AA) results. The ABM resulted in personnel allocation to enlisted guarantee programs at more uniform accession rates than AA.

show abstract

Section: ^ °mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Allocation Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Allocation Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Recruit Assignment Simulationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Marine Corps Recruit Classification: The Program Fill-Rate Component

Kroeker¹,

Folchi²

1985

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Using CLASP, Navy classifiers place first-term enlistees in ratings appropriate to their ability levels, individual preferences, and Navy objectives and priorities (Kroeker «5c Rafacz, 1983).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Attrition-Severity Index (ASI) for Selected Navy Ratings: Development.

Thomas¹,

Elster²,

Euske³

et al. 1984

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe purpose of the research reported here was to develop an index of the severity of attrition in selected Navy ratings. MethodDemand for personnel was measured using rating size (number of persons in the rating), rating requirement (Navy's need for personnel), and rating priority (relative importance to the Navy), using the multiattribute functions of retention rates, replacement costs, and Navy demand for personnel. Alternatives to determining (a) Command; rating requirements were determined by comparing rating inventories with the Navy's requirements for personnel for the rating; and rating priority was determined using the method developed by Kroeker and Rafacz (1983

show abstract

Classification and Assignment within Pride (CLASP) System: Development and Evaluation of an Attrition Component

Kroeker¹,

Folchi²

1984

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this research, which was conducted under project Zil67-PN.02 (Computer-assisted Testing, Counseling, and Assignment of Recruits) was to develop and test an attrition utility component for the computerized personnel assignment system known as CLASP (Classification and Assignment Within PRIDE). Appreciation is expressed to RADM Freeman, USN (Ret.), (CNRC-013), LCDR Biegler (NMPC-^81), and LCDR Sheehan (NMPC-^82) for many helpful discussions concerning policy issues. An essential contribution to the success of this project was provided by LCDR P. Griffin (OPNAV-13) and Professors G. Thomas, K. Euske, and R. Elster of the Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, who conducted research that resulted in the derivation of the attrition severity index (ASI). The results are intended for use by Naval Military Personnel Command and Navy Recruiting Command CLASP program managers, as well as other Department of Defense agencies concerned with personnel allocation problems,

show abstract

Classification and Assignment within Pride (CLASP): A Recruit Assignment Model.

Cited by 5 publications

References 6 publications

Marine Corps Recruit Classification: The Program Fill-Rate Component

Marine Corps Recruit Classification: The Program Fill-Rate Component

Attrition-Severity Index (ASI) for Selected Navy Ratings: Development.

Classification and Assignment within Pride (CLASP) System: Development and Evaluation of an Attrition Component

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About