2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0034-4257(00)00169-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification and Change Detection Using Landsat TM Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
569
0
42

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,464 publications
(615 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
569
0
42
Order By: Relevance
“…All these masks are stored in the DC as they can be useful when analyzing data. The second step concerns the conversion to SR by applying and correcting atmospheric effect (Song, Woodcock, Seto, Lenney, & Macomber, 2001). After testing different algorithms such as Landsat Ecosystem Disturbance Adaptive Processing System (LEDAPS) (Schmidt, Jenkerson, Masek, Vermote, & Gao, 2013), R packages (RStoolbox and Landsat), Grass GIS algorithms (i.landsat.atcorr and i.atcorr), and the Simplifié Modèle d'Atmosphérique Correction (SMAC) (http://www.cesbio.ups-tlse.fr/multitemp/?page_id=2975), the final choice (based on efficiency, reliability, and easiness of integration in the workflow) was the Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum (6S) algorithm available in the Atmospheric and Radiometric Correction of Satellite Imagery (ARCSI 9 ) software (Vermote, Tanre, Deuze, Herman, & Morcette, 1997).…”
Section: Landsat Scenes Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these masks are stored in the DC as they can be useful when analyzing data. The second step concerns the conversion to SR by applying and correcting atmospheric effect (Song, Woodcock, Seto, Lenney, & Macomber, 2001). After testing different algorithms such as Landsat Ecosystem Disturbance Adaptive Processing System (LEDAPS) (Schmidt, Jenkerson, Masek, Vermote, & Gao, 2013), R packages (RStoolbox and Landsat), Grass GIS algorithms (i.landsat.atcorr and i.atcorr), and the Simplifié Modèle d'Atmosphérique Correction (SMAC) (http://www.cesbio.ups-tlse.fr/multitemp/?page_id=2975), the final choice (based on efficiency, reliability, and easiness of integration in the workflow) was the Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum (6S) algorithm available in the Atmospheric and Radiometric Correction of Satellite Imagery (ARCSI 9 ) software (Vermote, Tanre, Deuze, Herman, & Morcette, 1997).…”
Section: Landsat Scenes Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the procedure suggested by Chander et al (2009) to convert the original digital numbers to radiance values (L λ ), and the image-based cosine of the solar transmittance (COST) method (Chavez, 1996), to convert radiance to surface reflectance (ρ). The formulae described in Song et al (2001) assuming 1% surface reflectance for dark objects (Chavez, 1989(Chavez, , 1996 allowed us to calculate the path radiance (L p ) values. We estimated the optical thickness for Rayleigh scattering (ρ r ) following the equation specified in Kaufman (1989).…”
Section: Preprocessing Of the Landsat Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NDVI is the most commonly used and well-known vegetation index and, as previously mentioned by Song et al (2001), has been used in several studies to monitor vegetation dynamics (Sader 1987;Lenney et al 1996;Michener and Houhoulis 1997).…”
Section: Image Processing and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%