2022
DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.13444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification and Diagnosis of Cervical Dystonia: Revived Call for Consensus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These recommendations have been widely adopted and successfully applied 7 . However, a recent analysis found that the delineation of iCD is not fully accounted for by the previously proposed general dystonia consensus 8,9 . In addition, the relationship between tremor and dystonia is particularly relevant for iCD patients, as approximately a half of them have head, neck, or upper limb tremor 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These recommendations have been widely adopted and successfully applied 7 . However, a recent analysis found that the delineation of iCD is not fully accounted for by the previously proposed general dystonia consensus 8,9 . In addition, the relationship between tremor and dystonia is particularly relevant for iCD patients, as approximately a half of them have head, neck, or upper limb tremor 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 7 However, a recent analysis found that the delineation of iCD is not fully accounted for by the previously proposed general dystonia consensus. 8 , 9 In addition, the relationship between tremor and dystonia is particularly relevant for iCD patients, as approximately a half of them have head, neck, or upper limb tremor. 10 Currently, there is no test to definitively diagnose iCD, and the gold standard is a clinical diagnosis based on history, clinical features, and phenomenology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%