2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-09770-1_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification and Disease Prediction Via Mathematical Programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Incorporating medically significant risk factors has been a major challenge because the improvement of risk prediction has to be assessed and quantified appropriately 8 . Data mining techniques 9 10 and mathematical programming 11 have been used to discover predictive rules from medical and biological data to improve disease prediction. In addition, artificial neural networks have been used to predict osteoporosis 12 and cancer 13 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incorporating medically significant risk factors has been a major challenge because the improvement of risk prediction has to be assessed and quantified appropriately 8 . Data mining techniques 9 10 and mathematical programming 11 have been used to discover predictive rules from medical and biological data to improve disease prediction. In addition, artificial neural networks have been used to predict osteoporosis 12 and cancer 13 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent work of Ayer et al (2012) begins to explore personalizing testing schedules incorporating risk factors and history of tests similarly to our work. Lee and Wu (2009) develop disease classification and prediction approaches using math programming.…”
Section: Current State Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus of pattern classification is to recognize similarities in the data, categorizing them in di↵erent subsets [9,10,29]. In many fields, such as the financial and the medical ones [19,22], classification of data (samples in Machine Learning language) is useful for analysis or diagnosis purposes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the results of four di↵erent 97.22 6.00 9.00 92.00 92.00 92.00 96.74 97 22. 5.97 9.00 90.00 90.00 90.00 PIMA 76.30 77.62 8.30 26.25 100.00 100.00 100.00 76.30 77.62 8.30 26.25 100.00 100.00 100.00 HEART 84.37 86.83 7.27 12.31 100.00 100.00 100.00 84.37 86.83 7.27 12.31 100.00 100.00 100.00 IONO 88.91 95.46 43.35 50.29 93.82 93.82 93.82 88.90 95.43 43.28 50.00 89.71 89.71 89.71 LIVER 72.58 74.39 5.14 48.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 72.58 74.39 5.14 48.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 .80 9.00 80.00 80.00 80.00 96.42 97.14 5.73 17.00 68.00 68.00 68.00 PIMA 76.30 77.60 8.27 26.25 96.25 96.25 96.25 75.86 77.26 7.74 26.25 78.75 78.75 78.75 HEART 83.95 86.88 7.33 13.07 98.46 98.46 98.46 83.95 86.97 5.16 9.23 58.46 58.46 58.46 IONO 88.59 95.46 42.13 49.71 80.30 80.30 80.30 88.28 94.61 27.06 36.18 45.30 45.30 45.30 LIVER 72.58 74.39 5.14 48.00 98.00 98.00 98.00 71.10 74.05 4.45 52.00 68.00 68.00 68.00Table 4.4…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%