2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification and enzyme kinetics of formate dehydrogenases for biomanufacturing via CO2 utilization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
0
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is often proposed that group-4 hydrogenases couple H2 production to the translocation of ions across the membrane -as it was recently demonstrated for the membrane-bound hydrogenase (Mbh) from Pyrococcus furiosus (McTernan et al, 2014;Yu et al, 2018). Indeed, the FHL-1 membrane arm exhibits two integral membrane subunits: HycD is predicted to be the membrane anchor for the soluble domain; while HycC is an antiporter-like protein predicted to translocate protons/ions (Schuchmann and Müller, 2013;Ceccaldi et al, 2017;Maia et al, 2017;Müller, 2019;Nielsen et al, 2019). Despite the similarity of the membrane arm of FHL-1 and the Complex I (Schwarz et al, 2018), it is has remained unclear if the E.coli enzyme is capable of translocating ions during disproportionation of formate.…”
Section: Effect Of Elevated Pressure On Cell Growth and Formate Produmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is often proposed that group-4 hydrogenases couple H2 production to the translocation of ions across the membrane -as it was recently demonstrated for the membrane-bound hydrogenase (Mbh) from Pyrococcus furiosus (McTernan et al, 2014;Yu et al, 2018). Indeed, the FHL-1 membrane arm exhibits two integral membrane subunits: HycD is predicted to be the membrane anchor for the soluble domain; while HycC is an antiporter-like protein predicted to translocate protons/ions (Schuchmann and Müller, 2013;Ceccaldi et al, 2017;Maia et al, 2017;Müller, 2019;Nielsen et al, 2019). Despite the similarity of the membrane arm of FHL-1 and the Complex I (Schwarz et al, 2018), it is has remained unclear if the E.coli enzyme is capable of translocating ions during disproportionation of formate.…”
Section: Effect Of Elevated Pressure On Cell Growth and Formate Produmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FDHs are a heterogeneous and broadly distributed group of enzymes that catalyse the reversible two-electron interconversion of formate and CO 2 (Eq. 1) [94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101]. These enzymes evolved to take part in diverse metabolic pathways, being used by some prokaryotic organism to fix (reduce) CO 2 into formate, while other prokaryotes use FDHs to derive energy, by coupling the formate oxidation (which has a very low reduction potential value, Eº′(CO 2 / HCOO − ) = −0.43 V) to the reduction of several terminal electron acceptors; FDHs are also broadly used by both prokaryotes and eukaryotes in C1 metabolism.…”
Section: Formate Dehydrogenases-enzymatic Machineriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These enzymes are widespread, being found in bacteria, yeasts, fungi and plants, are all (as far as is known) NAD-dependent and belong to the D-specific dehydrogenases of 2-oxyacids family. The other class-the metal-dependent FDHs class 3 -comprises only prokaryotic enzymes that hold different redox-active centres (Table 1) and whose active site harbours one molybdenum or one tungsten centre (molybdenum-containing FDH (Mo-FDH) or tungsten-containing FDH (W-FDH), respectively) [94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101][110][111][112]. (Fig.…”
Section: Formate Dehydrogenases-enzymatic Machineriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Metal-dependent formate dehydrogenases (FDHs) are paradigm electrocatalysts for the interconversion of CO 2 and formate, 1 , 2 and play a versatile range of roles in biological systems. 3 The FDHs from several organisms, including Desulfovibrio desulfuricans , 4 Rhodobacter capsulatus , 5 Cupriavidus necator (formerly Ralstonia eutropha ), 6 Escherichia coli , 2 Syntrophobacter fumaroxidans , 1 , 7 Acetobacterium woodi , 8 Methylobacterium extorquens , 9 Rhodobacter aestuarii , 10 and Methanococcus maripaludis , 11 have all been reported to catalyze both formate oxidation and CO 2 reduction in assays using solution electron donors/acceptors, although their relative rates of CO 2 reduction vary widely. The enzymes from S. fumaroxidans , D. vulgaris Hildenborough, and E. coli , which are the W-dependent FDHs Sf FDH1 1 and Dv FDH 12 , 13 and the Mo-dependent Ec FDH-H, 2 respectively, have further been shown to perform thermodynamically reversible (efficient) reduction of CO 2 to formate when immobilized on electrodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%