2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4401(01)00085-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification, facteurs favorisants, prévention et traitement des effets indésirables (EI) associés au bacille de Calmette-Guérin (BCG) dans le traitement des tumeurs superficielles de vessie

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the scope of care of people with NIMBC, there is little evidence on the use of a patient questionnaire to assess treatment side‐effects, due to limited randomized controlled trials 1 and only one validated instrument specific to bladder cancer QoL, published recently by the EORTC 7 . Self‐reported surveys could also be used to assess an individual's susceptibility to adverse effects, to identify patients at risk, and to ensure that preventive measures can be put in place at the earliest opportunity 11 . The main points to consider for the correct administration of intravesical BCG and increase patients' compliance are: 30,31 Accurate communication/education with the patient so they are aware of potential side effects arising when initiating the treatment; Appropriate verbal or written information which should highlight were patients could seek further support (i.e., key contact number, useful websites); Key worker/named nurse that will be responsible for the patient during his BCG treatment. Adequate records and patient support. Correct installation procedure. Early side‐effects diagnosis and treatment through a measurement tool (patient questionnaire). Appropriate early treatment to adverse events. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Within the scope of care of people with NIMBC, there is little evidence on the use of a patient questionnaire to assess treatment side‐effects, due to limited randomized controlled trials 1 and only one validated instrument specific to bladder cancer QoL, published recently by the EORTC 7 . Self‐reported surveys could also be used to assess an individual's susceptibility to adverse effects, to identify patients at risk, and to ensure that preventive measures can be put in place at the earliest opportunity 11 . The main points to consider for the correct administration of intravesical BCG and increase patients' compliance are: 30,31 Accurate communication/education with the patient so they are aware of potential side effects arising when initiating the treatment; Appropriate verbal or written information which should highlight were patients could seek further support (i.e., key contact number, useful websites); Key worker/named nurse that will be responsible for the patient during his BCG treatment. Adequate records and patient support. Correct installation procedure. Early side‐effects diagnosis and treatment through a measurement tool (patient questionnaire). Appropriate early treatment to adverse events. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simplified patient questionnaire is considered crucial as part of this process. 11,[19][20][21][22][23] This patient questionnaire must be tailored to each patient population and hospital practice, developed using robust tools (specific to structure and the design of the survey). Finally, they must be reflective of the language used by the local patient group, if they are going to be used in local clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations