2019
DOI: 10.1109/comst.2018.2876805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification Framework for Free Space Optical Communication Links and Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 249 publications
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Required high-speed wireless links can be obtained by state-of-the-art technologies such as millimeter wave [10] and free-space optical (FSO) communications [6], [11]. In particular, extremely high link capacities of FSO links can be further improved by wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) methods which yield a high fan-out (i.e., large number of channels per FSO link) as well as elastic topologies [12]. Recently, Ciaramella et al [13] achieved a total of 1.28 Tbps speed in an outdoor experiment over 212 meters distance by using WDM-FSO link of 32 wavelengths (32ˆ40 Gbps).…”
Section: B Problem Statement and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Required high-speed wireless links can be obtained by state-of-the-art technologies such as millimeter wave [10] and free-space optical (FSO) communications [6], [11]. In particular, extremely high link capacities of FSO links can be further improved by wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) methods which yield a high fan-out (i.e., large number of channels per FSO link) as well as elastic topologies [12]. Recently, Ciaramella et al [13] achieved a total of 1.28 Tbps speed in an outdoor experiment over 212 meters distance by using WDM-FSO link of 32 wavelengths (32ˆ40 Gbps).…”
Section: B Problem Statement and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the IoT five-layer model discussed in Section II, we can see that the OWC fits in the Object Abstraction layer with other RF technologies and standards, such as RFID, 5G, WiFi, Bluetooth Low Energy, etc. Unlike RF, OWC has fewer standards with the most notable standard being the IEEE 802.15.7-2018 [13], [70]. Therefore, in the case of OWC application in IoT, we cannot only mention the standard as is the case for RF.…”
Section: Owc Preliminaries and Basic Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OWC is the use of a modulated fast switching light emitter such as a Light Emitting Diode (LED) or Laser Diode (LD) to send data that can be received by image sensors (e.g., camera) or photodetectors [13]. The three frequency bands of Infrared (IR) 3 THz-300 THz, Visible Light (VL) 380 THz-790 THz, and Ultraviolet (UV) 790-3000 THz are commonly used to break up the large OWC bandwidth into frequencies with similar characteristics.…”
Section: A Owc Frequency Bands and Link Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations