2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2018.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification, geometry and applications of supersymmetric backgrounds

Abstract: We review the remarkable progress that has been made the last 15 years towards the classification of supersymmetric solutions with emphasis on the description of the bilinears and spinorial geometry methods. We describe in detail the geometry of backgrounds of key supergravity theories, which have applications in the context of black holes, string theory, M-theory and the AdS/CFT correspondence unveiling a plethora of existence and uniqueness theorems. Some other aspects of supersymmetric solutions like the Ki… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 258 publications
(528 reference statements)
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, we will focus on a class of models arising from type IIB/F-theory, the so called 'axilaton' models 1 [12][13][14][15][16][17]: (1) evade the oft-mentioned no-go theorem 2 [19][20][21][22], (2) form a discretuum owing to their stringy SL(2; Z) monodromy, (3) the overall lengthscale is determined by dimensional transmutation, (4) require g s ∼ O (1), with an effective incorporation of S-duality, and (5) relate two classes of standard supersymmetric string theory solutions [23,24] and [25], and a third, novel class. This resonates with some recent assessments [26], and some features of the recent efforts [27,28]; it reminds of the "T-fold" constructions [29][30][31][32], and qualifies the standard low-energy effective theory limit description as encouraging but incomplete: more of the stringy degrees of freedom must be included, as also advocated recently in the phase-space approach [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41], and also in the different, earlier double field theory approach [42][43][44][45][46].…”
Section: Jhep12(2019)166mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we will focus on a class of models arising from type IIB/F-theory, the so called 'axilaton' models 1 [12][13][14][15][16][17]: (1) evade the oft-mentioned no-go theorem 2 [19][20][21][22], (2) form a discretuum owing to their stringy SL(2; Z) monodromy, (3) the overall lengthscale is determined by dimensional transmutation, (4) require g s ∼ O (1), with an effective incorporation of S-duality, and (5) relate two classes of standard supersymmetric string theory solutions [23,24] and [25], and a third, novel class. This resonates with some recent assessments [26], and some features of the recent efforts [27,28]; it reminds of the "T-fold" constructions [29][30][31][32], and qualifies the standard low-energy effective theory limit description as encouraging but incomplete: more of the stringy degrees of freedom must be included, as also advocated recently in the phase-space approach [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41], and also in the different, earlier double field theory approach [42][43][44][45][46].…”
Section: Jhep12(2019)166mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past fifteen years there has been much progress towards the classification of solutions of supergravity theories that preserve a fraction of the supersymmetry, for a review see [1] and references within. Two main methods have been used for this.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gravitino KSE of a supergravity theory is the vanishing condition of the supersymmetry variation of the gravitino evaluated at the vanishing locus of all fermionic fields of the theory. Geometrically the gravitino KSE is a parallel transport equation, D = 0, for the supersymmetry parameter, 1 , with respect to the supercovariant connection, D, which is constructed from the fields of the theory. The supersymmetry variations of the remaining fermions of the theory give rise to algebraic conditions on .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is then applied to classifying supergravity solutions by employing gauge transformations in order to express the Killing spinors in simplified canonical forms, which are then used to solve the Killing spinor equations. Such techniques were first used to classify supersymmetric solutions in D=11 supergravity [16], and have also been applied to heterotic and type II supergravity theories [17,18,19,20]; see also the review [22] for a comprehensive description of the applications of spinorial geometry to the classification programme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%