2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icdmw.2011.47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification in Presence of Drift and Latency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these approaches, each class is represented as a mixture of subpopulations, and distributions of the unlabeled data from subpopulations are tracked and matched to those known subpopulations based on initial labeled data. Special cases where subpopulations are mixtures of fixed number of Gaussians is described in [46], and for cases, when drift is only due to the changes in priors of the subpopulations is addressed in [47] and [48]. Another example of this group of algorithms is Krempl's APT algorithm [49].…”
Section: E Nonstationary Environments With Verification Latencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these approaches, each class is represented as a mixture of subpopulations, and distributions of the unlabeled data from subpopulations are tracked and matched to those known subpopulations based on initial labeled data. Special cases where subpopulations are mixtures of fixed number of Gaussians is described in [46], and for cases, when drift is only due to the changes in priors of the subpopulations is addressed in [47] and [48]. Another example of this group of algorithms is Krempl's APT algorithm [49].…”
Section: E Nonstationary Environments With Verification Latencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, boosting could be carried out on the semi-parametric GAM to see if this produces further performance gains (Bühlmann and Hothorn, 2007;Tutz and Binder, 2008). Second, using a different type of GAM may offer alternative A C C E P T E D M A N U S C R I P T ways to handle class imbalance (Calabrese and Osmetti, 2013 Finally, exploring how population drift may affect model performance would also be an interesting area of research (Krempl and Hofer, 2011). More practically, testing over various prediction horizons (18, 24 months) and perhaps fitting models to a longer time span than the one used in this study would be beneficial before deployment either within financial institutions or by regulatory This section contains results of testing for differences in performance across classifiers trained using the AUC and referred to in section 5.1 of the main text.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to Biernacki et al (2002) and Beninel et al (2012), it is assumed that the population contains several subpopulations, and that these components do not necessarily behave in the same way as the whole class to which they belong. In contrast to the model in Krempl and Hofer (2011), the number of subpopulations can change over the course of time. The method is based on the idea that unlabelled data give information on the new locations of subpopulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Other definitions (see for example Ditzler et al, 2012;Krempl & Hofer, 2011), have a strong focus on the time component, i.e. changes are distinguished in terms of whether they are gradual (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation