2016
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-annals-iii-3-169-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Airborne Laser Scanning Data Using Geometric Multi-Scale Features and Different Neighbourhood Types

Abstract: ABSTRACT:In this paper, we address the classification of airborne laser scanning data. We present a novel methodology relying on the use of complementary types of geometric features extracted from multiple local neighbourhoods of different scale and type. To demonstrate the performance of our methodology, we present results of a detailed evaluation on a standard benchmark dataset and we show that the consideration of multi-scale, multi-type neighbourhoods as the basis for feature extraction leads to improved c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies used 3D labelled LiDAR data benchmarks (Blomley et al, 2016;Vosselman et al, 2017) or 2D labelled LiDAR data benchmarks that were extended to 3D labelled points (Niemeyer et al, 2014), which were not available for the tested study area. Also, the 3D reference points could be provided by the supplier or manually labeled (Xu et al, 2014); however this is time consuming and might introduce errors from the human operator or analyst.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Classification Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies used 3D labelled LiDAR data benchmarks (Blomley et al, 2016;Vosselman et al, 2017) or 2D labelled LiDAR data benchmarks that were extended to 3D labelled points (Niemeyer et al, 2014), which were not available for the tested study area. Also, the 3D reference points could be provided by the supplier or manually labeled (Xu et al, 2014); however this is time consuming and might introduce errors from the human operator or analyst.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Classification Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 3D point classification of the airborne LiDAR data, multi-class labeling has become an essential topic for 3D city modeling, change detection, map updating, disaster evaluation and emergency purposes. However, most recent studies focus on the geometric characteristics described by the LiDAR data (Mallet et al, 2011;Xu et al, 2014;Blomley et al, 2016;Vosselman et al, 2017). Studies rarely reported using the intensity LiDAR data along with the geometric features extracted from the LiDAR data for the purpose of urban areas classification.…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the experiment, a commonly structured workflow was used (e.g. Weinmann et al, 2014;Blomley et al, 2016), consisting of four components: neighbourhood definition (Section 2.1), feature extraction (Section 2.2), selection of relevant features (Section 2.3) and classification (Section 2.4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iii) The scale of the neighbourhood selected for each point depends on the properties of the neighbourhood. The scale can be selected based on eigenentropy (de Blomley et al, 2016) (Blomley et al, 2016). This strategy allows to generalise from a specific data set, but still suffers from the disability to capture context from different scales, like for example a car has tires (scale less than 1m) and appears almost always on the road (scale of several meters).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%