2020
DOI: 10.3390/met10050630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Bainitic Structures Using Textural Parameters and Machine Learning Techniques

Abstract: Bainite is an essential constituent of modern high strength steels. In addition to the still great challenge of characterization, the classification of bainite poses difficulties. Challenges when dealing with bainite are the variety and amount of involved phases, the fineness and complexity of the structures and that there is often no consensus among human experts in labeling and classifying those. Therefore, an objective and reproducible characterization and classification is crucial. To achieve this, it is n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present work, we refer to these microstructures as polygonal ferrite (PF, featureless gray regions), degenerated pearlite (DP, arrow highlighted bright region) and degenerated upper bainite (DUB, ellipse highlighted regions with fine substructure). The designations polygonal ferrite, degenerated pearlite and degenerated upper bainite and their abbreviations PF, DP and DUB are used as proposed by Zajac et al [19] and have been frequently adapted by many researchers such as [11,[31][32][33][34]. Figures 3a and b show that the PF and DP volume fractions decrease as b increases from 0.5 K/s to 1 K/s.…”
Section: Microstructural Features Observed By Semmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present work, we refer to these microstructures as polygonal ferrite (PF, featureless gray regions), degenerated pearlite (DP, arrow highlighted bright region) and degenerated upper bainite (DUB, ellipse highlighted regions with fine substructure). The designations polygonal ferrite, degenerated pearlite and degenerated upper bainite and their abbreviations PF, DP and DUB are used as proposed by Zajac et al [19] and have been frequently adapted by many researchers such as [11,[31][32][33][34]. Figures 3a and b show that the PF and DP volume fractions decrease as b increases from 0.5 K/s to 1 K/s.…”
Section: Microstructural Features Observed By Semmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the suggested approach could also be attempted using other edge detectors or other operators like Fourier and Hough transform. By adding other features to the convolution operator, e.g., textural features as described in [36], the segmentation could be expanded to simultaneously perform a microstructure classification.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding further analyses of the segmented image, using the binary image as a mask to the original image allows a separate analysis of the lath-like bainite, e.g., to further distinguish upper and degenerate upper bainite. This could be accomplished by calculating textural parameters from these regions, as suggested by Müller et al [36]. In addition, granular and lath-like regions can be analyzed independently, e.g., morphological parameters of the carbon-rich second phase such as size distributions, particle shapes and mean free distance between particles for microstructure-properties correlations can be calculated for each type of bainite instead of calculating it for the entire image.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches to quantify the separate microstructure constituents using EBSD individually have been reported 11,12 . Müller et al 13 developed a procedure to segment lath-shaped bainite in CP steel micrographs consisting of lath-shaped and granular bainite by analyzing the microstructure constituents' directionality. Bulgarevich et al 14 used a trainable segmentation with a random forest classifier to segment ferrite, pearlite, and bainite in light optical micrographs of three-phase steels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As opposed to these works, supporting correlative electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) information is used in the LOM and SEM annotation procedure to lay an appropriate foundation for learning. Moreover, the aforementioned conventional CV or ML approaches require complex image processing pipelines and elaborate feature engineering to render predictions robust against variances 13 . In contrast, the applied DL methods are directly based on input and target output image pairs (representation learning).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%