2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-14084-6_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Battlefield Ground Vehicles Based on the Acoustic Emissions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…chosen to optimize this integration system was a algorithm a better recognition rate was achieved integration system were obtained in the modular neural network. As comparison of results, we can mention that in [47] a 93.33% recognition rate was while in this work we were able to obtain recognition rates of 99.76%. This fact shows that the proposed approach can outperform similar neural approaches in the literature for iris for person recognition using the iris biometric measurement modular neural network architectures with 3 layers in each neurons in the first hidden layer, 116 and 113 in the 2nd the third hidden layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…chosen to optimize this integration system was a algorithm a better recognition rate was achieved integration system were obtained in the modular neural network. As comparison of results, we can mention that in [47] a 93.33% recognition rate was while in this work we were able to obtain recognition rates of 99.76%. This fact shows that the proposed approach can outperform similar neural approaches in the literature for iris for person recognition using the iris biometric measurement modular neural network architectures with 3 layers in each neurons in the first hidden layer, 116 and 113 in the 2nd the third hidden layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…After applying the recognition rate was achieved, because better results with were obtained in the modular neural network. As comparison of results, we can mention that in [47] a 93.33% recognition rate was while in this work we were able to obtain recognition rates of 99.76%. This fact shows that the proposed approach can outperform similar neural approaches in the literature for iris biometric measurement was layers in each module, hidden layer, and each generation of the a recognition rate of 98.48%, with an average error of 0.0202, and for or validation of the gating network with Triangular type 99.37%, and for the this integrator was on for the validation with triangular type Gaussian type MFs the integration were not optimize the membership The evolutionary method After applying the genetic results with the optimized ISSN: 1693-6930…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation