2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10722-015-0307-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of bentgrass (Agrostis) cultivars and accessions based on microsatellite (SSR) markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is unclear if the plants were grown to an identifiable stage, and if voucher specimens were prepared (Amundsen and Warnke 2012). Indeed, Honig et al (2015) found identification errors in material of Agrostis obtained from this seed bank. On the other hand, the infraspecific variation may be real.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It is unclear if the plants were grown to an identifiable stage, and if voucher specimens were prepared (Amundsen and Warnke 2012). Indeed, Honig et al (2015) found identification errors in material of Agrostis obtained from this seed bank. On the other hand, the infraspecific variation may be real.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…& Reut. (dryland bentgrass, 2 n =6 x =42, A 1 A 1 A 2 A 2 ) and A. gigantea (redtop bentgrass, 2 n =6 x =42, A 1 A 1 A 2 A 2 A 3 A 3 ) (Jones 1956a, c, b, Rotter et al 2007, 2010, Honig et al 2015). Characterizing relationships among these species has been challenging because most are allopolyploids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations