2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-93000-8_91
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Breast Cancer Histology Image using Ensemble of Pre-trained Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fine-tuning for classification is usually performed as follows: 1) the network is initialized with weights trained to solve a natural image classification problem such as the ImageNet classification task; 2) the classification head, usually a fully-connected layer, is replaced by a new one with randomly initialized parameters; 3) initially, the new classification head is trained for a fixed number of iterations by inputting the medical images and inhibiting the filters of the pre-trained model to change; 4) then, different blocks of the pre-trained model are progressively allowed to learn and adapt to the new features, allowing the model to move to new local optima and increase the overall performance of the network. (Chennamsetty et al, 2018) used an ensemble of Ima-geNet pre-trained CNNs to classify the images from Part A. Specifically, the algorithm is composed of a ResNet-101 (He et al, 2016) and two DenseNet-161 (Huang et al, 2017) networks fine-tunned with images from varying data normalization schemes.…”
Section: Teammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fine-tuning for classification is usually performed as follows: 1) the network is initialized with weights trained to solve a natural image classification problem such as the ImageNet classification task; 2) the classification head, usually a fully-connected layer, is replaced by a new one with randomly initialized parameters; 3) initially, the new classification head is trained for a fixed number of iterations by inputting the medical images and inhibiting the filters of the pre-trained model to change; 4) then, different blocks of the pre-trained model are progressively allowed to learn and adapt to the new features, allowing the model to move to new local optima and increase the overall performance of the network. (Chennamsetty et al, 2018) used an ensemble of Ima-geNet pre-trained CNNs to classify the images from Part A. Specifically, the algorithm is composed of a ResNet-101 (He et al, 2016) and two DenseNet-161 (Huang et al, 2017) networks fine-tunned with images from varying data normalization schemes.…”
Section: Teammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several state-of-the-art pre-trained deep learning models available. Because of the superior performance of deep learning models in computer vision and image processing, researchers also started using them in breast cancer diagnosis [1,5,7,12,12,15,18,19,21,23,24,26,28,37,38]. Initially, to leverage the benefit of deep learning with machine learning, Araujo et al [1] combined DLM and SVM to classify breast cancer histology images.…”
Section: Deep Learning-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Rakhlin et al [26] also extracted features using several DLMs and classified using gradient boosted trees algorithm [16]. Similarly, Chennamsetty et al [7] also designed an ensemble of three DLMs, each of which was trained on different configurations that won the BACH challenge [2]. Recently, Yang et al [38] presented an ensemble model, called EMS-Net, of DLMs using multi-scale features and fine-tuning of several pre-trained models.…”
Section: Deep Learning-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was concluded that CNN was the most successful method to classify these breast cancer images [33]. The top performers [34,35,36] in this challenge used the architecture of an existing network such as Resnet [37], Densenet [38], Inception [39], VGG16 [40], etc and pre-trained these networks using ImageNet [41]. Although CNN perform better for image classification than other machine learning techniques in terms of accuracy, their parameters are deterministic and thus can not provide any measure of uncertainty in predictions.…”
Section: State-of-the-art Machine Learning Algorithms Formentioning
confidence: 98%