2017
DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.4.2.024507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of breast masses in ultrasound images using self-adaptive differential evolution extreme learning machine and rough set feature selection

Abstract: A method using rough set feature selection and extreme learning machine (ELM) whose learning strategy and hidden node parameters are optimized by self-adaptive differential evolution (SaDE) algorithm for classification of breast masses is investigated. A pathologically proven database of 140 breast ultrasound images, including 80 benign and 60 malignant, is used for this study. A fast nonlocal means algorithm is applied for speckle noise removal, and multiresolution analysis of undecimated discrete wavelet tra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ten features of the BI‐RADS were extracted from ultrasound images to differentiate between benign and malignant breast nodules, and the best AUC was 0.84 31 . During another study, 32 29 texture features and 500 morphological features acquired from 140 breast ultrasound images were applied to classify breast lesions, producing an AUC of 0.96, specificity of 97.5%, sensitivity of 96.7%, and accuracy of 97.1%. By extracting the edge echo and edge angle features from the breast ultrasound image and the age of the patient, a radiomics model was constructed (AUC, 0.870) 33 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten features of the BI‐RADS were extracted from ultrasound images to differentiate between benign and malignant breast nodules, and the best AUC was 0.84 31 . During another study, 32 29 texture features and 500 morphological features acquired from 140 breast ultrasound images were applied to classify breast lesions, producing an AUC of 0.96, specificity of 97.5%, sensitivity of 96.7%, and accuracy of 97.1%. By extracting the edge echo and edge angle features from the breast ultrasound image and the age of the patient, a radiomics model was constructed (AUC, 0.870) 33 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each gender, seven ML-based approaches (single and hybrid) were applied to model the PVBSP. These ML classification methodologies included the single algorithm support vector machine (SVM) [ 36 ], K-nearest neighbor (KNN) [ 52 ], random forest (RF) [ 53 ], decision tree (DT) [ 54 ], and extreme learning machine (ELM) [ 55 ], as well as the hybrid self-adaptive ELM (SA-ELM) [ 56 ], and a combination of decision tree and self-adaptive ELM (DT-SAELM). For details on their implementation, refer to Additional file 5 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The boundaries of the lesion play an important role in ultrasound based diagnosis of early breast cancer. Preserving the tiny structure of lesions is significant when they are despeckled [31]. The corresponding numerical comparisons in Table.7 show that the proposed NLM method can retain image boundaries and preserve small lesion structures more effectively than other methods.…”
Section: Experiments On Real Us Imagesmentioning
confidence: 96%