2017
DOI: 10.1117/12.2249981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of breast MRI lesions using small-size training sets: comparison of deep learning approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We discuss the brain-tumor data augmentation techniques already available in the literature, and divide them into several groups depending on their underlying concepts (section 2). Such MRI data augmentation approaches have been applied to augment other datasets as well, also acquired for different organs (Amit et al, 2017;Nguyen et al, 2019;Oksuz et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We discuss the brain-tumor data augmentation techniques already available in the literature, and divide them into several groups depending on their underlying concepts (section 2). Such MRI data augmentation approaches have been applied to augment other datasets as well, also acquired for different organs (Amit et al, 2017;Nguyen et al, 2019;Oksuz et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with traditional methods, the main advantage of deep learning models is its capability in extracting highly representative features in a data‐driven way. Recently, the efficacy of deep neural networks has been evaluated in breast cancer classification tasks . However, these works either used a small‐size dataset or needed manual annotations on lesions during the training phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the efficacy of deep neural networks has been evaluated in breast cancer classification tasks. [28][29][30] However, these works either used a small-size dataset or needed manual annotations on lesions during the training phase. Directly localizing breast cancers in 3D radiology images with only image-level supervision has not yet been extensively explored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the ROIs in their training dataset were only extracted from the DCE-MRI slices at the second post-contrast time point, which ignored kinetic and 3D context features. Amit et al [21] proposed a multichannel representation for DCE-MRI images that could capture both the anatomical and metabolic characteristics of lesions in a single multi-channel image and enabled a high accuracy. However, their dataset was relatively small, and they could not assess the classification in a single patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%